PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHQ vs. AQMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHQ vs. AQMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than AQMNX's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has outperformed AQMNX with an annualized return of 14.91%, while AQMNX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.71% annualized return.


SPHQ

1D
0.58%
1M
3.64%
YTD
14.28%
6M
15.48%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
14.25%
10Y*
14.91%

AQMNX

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.24%
YTD
12.24%
6M
14.33%
1Y
24.98%
3Y*
12.16%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
4.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHQ vs. AQMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
14.28%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%
AQMNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N
12.24%14.38%7.96%1.79%35.16%-1.31%-0.62%1.57%-9.12%-1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and AQMNX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.06

The correlation between SPHQ and AQMNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (5 years) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. AQMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

AQMNX
AQMNX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AQMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AQMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. AQMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHQAQMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.50

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

7.83

-5.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

26.39

-16.20

SPHQ vs. AQMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the AQMNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and AQMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHQAQMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.84

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

1.07

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.46

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.38

+0.14

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. AQMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than AQMNX's maximum drawdown of -27.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and AQMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHQAQMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

-27.50%

-30.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-3.15%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-13.70%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-13.70%

-11.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-24.13%

-7.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-1.12%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-10.39%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

0.99%

+1.10%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. AQMNX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) at 2.61%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHQAQMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

2.61%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

6.70%

+3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

8.69%

+4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

11.55%

+4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.88%

10.33%

+7.55%

SPHQ vs. AQMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AQMNX's 2.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHQ vs. AQMNX - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than AQMNX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQMNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N
1.83%2.05%3.61%8.15%12.59%6.59%4.17%2.92%0.00%0.00%0.02%6.30%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.05%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHQ and AQMNX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHQ has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to AQMNX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs AQMNX's -27.50%.

AQMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHQ and AQMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer