PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGI vs. CRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SPGI vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGI achieves a -19.82% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -30.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGI has outperformed CRM with an annualized return of 15.58%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.


SPGI

1D
-1.73%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
-19.82%
6M
-14.85%
1Y
-19.02%
3Y*
3.63%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
15.58%

CRM

1D
-1.68%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-30.92%
6M
-29.37%
1Y
-33.00%
3Y*
-4.89%
5Y*
-4.74%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGI vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPGI
S&P Global Inc.
-19.82%5.71%13.94%32.79%-28.38%44.68%21.40%62.27%1.37%59.32%
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
-30.92%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGI and CRM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2004

0.43

The correlation between SPGI and CRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.50 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SPGI:

$124.13B

CRM:

$159.00B

EPS

SPGI:

$15.79

CRM:

$8.59

PE Ratio

SPGI:

26.42

CRM:

21.25

PEG Ratio

SPGI:

3.45

CRM:

0.04

PS Ratio

SPGI:

8.02

CRM:

3.98

PB Ratio

SPGI:

3.97

CRM:

4.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

SPGI:

$15.73B

CRM:

$42.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SPGI:

$8.15B

CRM:

$33.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

SPGI:

$7.83B

CRM:

$12.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGI vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGI
SPGI Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SPGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGI Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGI Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGI vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPGICRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.86

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

-0.84

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

-1.62

+0.41

SPGI vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGI Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is comparable to the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGI and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPGICRMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

-0.88

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

-0.13

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.24

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.45

0.00

Drawdowns

SPGI vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGI drawdown since its inception was -74.67%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGI and CRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGICRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.67%

-70.50%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.48%

-39.36%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.48%

-54.70%

+24.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.76%

-58.62%

+18.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.76%

-58.62%

+18.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.45%

-49.87%

+24.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.22%

-16.12%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.77%

20.48%

-4.71%

Volatility

SPGI vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) is 8.15%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 16.96%. This indicates that SPGI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGICRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

16.96%

-8.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.85%

31.74%

-7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.42%

37.87%

-10.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.47%

37.02%

-12.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.03%

35.36%

-9.33%

Dividends

SPGI vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

SPGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than CRM's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
0.92%0.63%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPGI
S&P Global Inc.
0.93%0.73%0.73%0.82%0.99%0.65%0.82%0.84%1.18%0.97%1.34%1.34%

Financials

SPGI vs. CRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between S&P Global Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
4.17B
11.13B
(SPGI) Total Revenue
(CRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SPGI vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between S&P Global Inc. and Salesforce, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
76.9%
Portfolio components
SPGI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, S&P Global Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

SPGI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, S&P Global Inc. reported an operating income of 2.00B and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

SPGI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, S&P Global Inc. reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in a net margin of 33.5%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPGI and CRM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRM has higher volatility (16.96%) compared to SPGI (8.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGI dropped -74.67% vs CRM's -70.50%.

SPGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGI and CRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer