SPDN vs. GDX
SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPDN is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPDN returned -12.43%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for GDX. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. SPDN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
SPDN vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDN achieves a -5.89% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -8.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SPDN has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of -12.43%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.
SPDN
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -5.89%
- 6M
- -5.63%
- 1Y
- -14.82%
- 3Y*
- -12.12%
- 5Y*
- -8.55%
- 10Y*
- -12.43%
GDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 53.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
SPDN vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -5.89% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -15.04% | 18.63% | -23.72% | -24.56% | -21.94% | 5.41% | -17.16% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -8.28% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDN and GDX is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2016 | -0.20 |
The correlation between SPDN and GDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to -0.20 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDN vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
SPDN
GDX
SPDN vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPDN | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.22 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 1.68 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 4.32 | -5.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPDN | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.21 | 1.16 | -2.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.51 | 0.47 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.69 | 0.35 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.69 | 0.12 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
SPDN vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDN drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDN and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDN | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | -80.34% | +5.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.73% | -32.09% | +14.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.24% | -32.09% | -6.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.85% | -46.51% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.31% | -49.79% | -25.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.65% | -32.09% | -42.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.57% | -40.43% | -8.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.71% | 12.42% | -2.71% |
Volatility
SPDN vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) is 3.55%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 16.05%. This indicates that SPDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDN | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 16.05% | -12.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 38.61% | -29.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 46.36% | -34.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 36.61% | -19.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 37.27% | -19.22% |
SPDN vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPDN vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
SPDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than GDX's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 4.01% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDN and GDX have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to SPDN (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDN dropped -75.31% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 12.82% vs -12.43% for SPDN. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 12.82% return vs -12.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
SPDN has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 0.80% for GDX.
SPDN is categorized as Inverse Equities, while GDX is Gold. SPDN tracks S&P 500 Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPDN and 0.51% for GDX.
GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDN and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer