SOUN vs. SVM
SOUN (SoundHound AI, Inc.) and SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) are both stocks. SOUN operates in Software - Application (Technology), while SVM operates in Silver (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, SOUN returned 35.66%/yr vs 52.84%/yr for SVM. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SOUN vs. SVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOUN achieves a -24.87% return, which is significantly lower than SVM's 27.95% return.
SOUN
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -15.65%
- YTD
- -24.87%
- 6M
- -40.93%
- 1Y
- -25.91%
- 3Y*
- 35.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SVM
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -20.96%
- YTD
- 27.95%
- 6M
- 36.46%
- 1Y
- 156.34%
- 3Y*
- 52.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- 18.19%
SOUN vs. SVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc. | -24.87% | -49.75% | 835.85% | 19.77% | -79.70% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 27.95% | 179.29% | 14.88% | -10.33% | -1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOUN and SVM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
SOUN:
$2.54B
SVM:
$2.35B
SOUN:
-$0.43
SVM:
-$0.05
SOUN:
15.98
SVM:
5.35
SOUN:
5.50
SVM:
2.50
SOUN:
$183.99M
SVM:
$437.11M
SOUN:
$69.84M
SVM:
$254.02M
SOUN:
-$124.47M
SVM:
$185.32M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOUN vs. SVM — Risk / Return Rank
SOUN
SVM
SOUN vs. SVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOUN | SVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.33 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 4.57 | -4.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | 12.47 | -13.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOUN | SVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | 2.31 | -2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.17 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
SOUN vs. SVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOUN drawdown since its inception was -93.55%, roughly equal to the maximum SVM drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOUN and SVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOUN | SVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.55% | -98.00% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.43% | -34.46% | -37.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.65% | -42.86% | -32.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -68.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.09% | -46.09% | -23.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.95% | -71.67% | +4.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.50% | 12.59% | +31.91% |
Volatility
SOUN vs. SVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) is 19.06%, while Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a volatility of 25.49%. This indicates that SOUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOUN | SVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.06% | 25.49% | -6.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.57% | 55.03% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.46% | 68.20% | +12.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.34% | 55.30% | +81.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.34% | 61.63% | +74.71% |
Dividends
SOUN vs. SVM - Dividend Comparison
SOUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.83% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.66% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 2.13% |
Financials
SOUN vs. SVM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SoundHound AI, Inc. and Silvercorp Metals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SOUN and SVM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVM has higher volatility (25.49%) compared to SOUN (19.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOUN dropped -93.55% vs SVM's -98.00%.
SVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOUN and SVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer