PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNR.L vs. SRP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNR.L vs. SRP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Senior PLC (SNR.L) and Serco Group (SRP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNR.L achieves a 48.44% return, which is significantly higher than SRP.L's -8.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SNR.L has underperformed SRP.L with an annualized return of 3.74%, while SRP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.34% annualized return.


SNR.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.53%
YTD
48.44%
6M
51.39%
1Y
69.84%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
3.74%

SRP.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
-5.93%
YTD
-8.23%
6M
-0.77%
1Y
34.32%
3Y*
23.08%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
9.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNR.L vs. SRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNR.L
Senior PLC
48.44%24.07%-9.08%42.87%-14.67%64.71%-48.38%-6.33%-26.09%37.05%
SRP.L
Serco Group
-8.23%89.19%-5.26%5.87%16.82%14.27%-26.19%69.35%-3.34%-30.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SNR.L and SRP.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2006

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SNR.L:

£1.19B

SRP.L:

£2.64B

EPS

SNR.L:

£0.13

SRP.L:

£0.18

PE Ratio

SNR.L:

21.79

SRP.L:

13.84

PEG Ratio

SNR.L:

2.49

SRP.L:

0.37

PS Ratio

SNR.L:

0.70

SRP.L:

0.27

PB Ratio

SNR.L:

3.12

SRP.L:

3.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNR.L:

£1.72B

SRP.L:

£9.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNR.L:

£173.70M

SRP.L:

£1.06B

EBITDA (TTM)

SNR.L:

£166.90M

SRP.L:

£513.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNR.L vs. SRP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNR.L
SNR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SNR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SNR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SRP.L
SRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNR.L vs. SRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Senior PLC (SNR.L) and Serco Group (SRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNR.LSRP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.30

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

1.58

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.12

5.33

+6.79

SNR.L vs. SRP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNR.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the SRP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNR.L and SRP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNR.LSRP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.69

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.67

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.32

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.06

+0.19

Drawdowns

SNR.L vs. SRP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNR.L drawdown since its inception was -86.80%, which is greater than SRP.L's maximum drawdown of -82.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNR.L and SRP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNR.LSRP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.80%

-82.19%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.16%

-21.61%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.05%

-28.78%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.71%

-28.78%

-9.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.77%

-44.30%

-42.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.56%

-35.59%

+28.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.41%

-44.71%

+13.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

6.42%

-0.69%

Volatility

SNR.L vs. SRP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Senior PLC (SNR.L) is 1.28%, while Serco Group (SRP.L) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that SNR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNR.LSRP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

6.13%

-4.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.76%

15.74%

+10.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.96%

20.25%

+13.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.72%

22.94%

+10.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.61%

29.41%

+13.20%

Dividends

SNR.L vs. SRP.L - Dividend Comparison

SNR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than SRP.L's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SNR.L
Senior PLC
1.05%1.28%1.13%0.66%0.18%0.00%0.00%3.19%2.75%1.88%2.39%1.86%
SRP.L
Serco Group
1.77%1.53%1.75%1.39%1.20%1.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SNR.L vs. SRP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Senior PLC and Serco Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
367.00M
2.49B
(SNR.L) Total Revenue
(SRP.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

SNR.L vs. SRP.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Senior PLC and Serco Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
-7.8%
10.6%
Portfolio components
SNR.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Senior PLC reported a gross profit of -28.60M and revenue of 367.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -7.8%.

SRP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Serco Group reported a gross profit of 262.80M and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.6%.

SNR.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Senior PLC reported an operating income of 15.30M and revenue of 367.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

SRP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Serco Group reported an operating income of 125.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

SNR.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Senior PLC reported a net income of 8.40M and revenue of 367.00M, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.

SRP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Serco Group reported a net income of 57.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SNR.L and SRP.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNR.L and SRP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer