SNR.L vs. CHRT.L
SNR.L (Senior PLC) and CHRT.L (Cohort plc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, SNR.L returned 3.74%/yr vs 16.50%/yr for CHRT.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SNR.L vs. CHRT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNR.L achieves a 48.44% return, which is significantly higher than CHRT.L's 41.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SNR.L has underperformed CHRT.L with an annualized return of 3.74%, while CHRT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.50% annualized return.
SNR.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 48.44%
- 6M
- 51.39%
- 1Y
- 69.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 14.21%
- 10Y*
- 3.74%
CHRT.L
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 13.12%
- YTD
- 41.48%
- 6M
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- -18.45%
- 3Y*
- 40.70%
- 5Y*
- 18.11%
- 10Y*
- 16.50%
SNR.L vs. CHRT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNR.L Senior PLC | 48.44% | 24.07% | -9.08% | 42.87% | -14.67% | 64.71% | -48.38% | -6.33% | -26.09% | 37.05% |
CHRT.L Cohort plc | 41.48% | -15.64% | 99.97% | 13.45% | -3.81% | -14.13% | -10.63% | 94.12% | 14.53% | -15.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNR.L and CHRT.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2006 | 0.09 |
The correlation between SNR.L and CHRT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SNR.L:
£1.19B
CHRT.L:
£593.44M
SNR.L:
£0.13
CHRT.L:
£0.81
SNR.L:
21.79
CHRT.L:
15.76
SNR.L:
2.49
CHRT.L:
0.41
SNR.L:
0.70
CHRT.L:
1.17
SNR.L:
3.12
CHRT.L:
3.59
SNR.L:
£1.72B
CHRT.L:
£507.09M
SNR.L:
£173.70M
CHRT.L:
£152.43M
SNR.L:
£166.90M
CHRT.L:
£68.05M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNR.L vs. CHRT.L — Risk / Return Rank
SNR.L
CHRT.L
SNR.L vs. CHRT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Senior PLC (SNR.L) and Cohort plc (CHRT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNR.L | CHRT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.97 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | -0.38 | +4.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | -0.66 | +12.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNR.L | CHRT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | -0.37 | +2.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.44 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.47 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.00 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
SNR.L vs. CHRT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNR.L drawdown since its inception was -86.80%, smaller than the maximum CHRT.L drawdown of -99.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNR.L and CHRT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNR.L | CHRT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.80% | -99.28% | +12.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.16% | -48.22% | +30.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.05% | -48.22% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.71% | -48.22% | +9.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.77% | -48.22% | -38.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.56% | -79.72% | +72.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.41% | -78.74% | +47.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 27.78% | -22.05% |
Volatility
SNR.L vs. CHRT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Senior PLC (SNR.L) is 1.28%, while Cohort plc (CHRT.L) has a volatility of 20.37%. This indicates that SNR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHRT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNR.L | CHRT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 20.37% | -19.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.76% | 36.53% | -10.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.96% | 49.97% | -16.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.72% | 40.91% | -7.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.61% | 35.02% | +7.59% |
Dividends
SNR.L vs. CHRT.L - Dividend Comparison
SNR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than CHRT.L's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRT.L Cohort plc | 1.32% | 1.80% | 1.36% | 2.41% | 2.43% | 1.42% | 2.15% | 1.26% | 2.16% | 2.09% | 1.46% | 1.31% |
SNR.L Senior PLC | 1.05% | 1.28% | 1.13% | 0.66% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.19% | 2.75% | 1.88% | 2.39% | 1.86% |
Financials
SNR.L vs. CHRT.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Senior PLC and Cohort plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SNR.L vs. CHRT.L - Profitability Comparison
SNR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Senior PLC reported a gross profit of -28.60M and revenue of 367.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -7.8%.
CHRT.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cohort plc reported a gross profit of 35.06M and revenue of 128.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
SNR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Senior PLC reported an operating income of 15.30M and revenue of 367.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
CHRT.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cohort plc reported an operating income of 8.20M and revenue of 128.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
SNR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Senior PLC reported a net income of 8.40M and revenue of 367.00M, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.
CHRT.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cohort plc reported a net income of 6.11M and revenue of 128.82M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNR.L and CHRT.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SNR.L and CHRT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer