SNAP vs. NAK
SNAP (Snap Inc.) and NAK (Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.) are both stocks. SNAP operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while NAK operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, SNAP returned -38.02%/yr vs 28.06%/yr for NAK. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SNAP vs. NAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SNAP
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -7.07%
- YTD
- -29.99%
- 6M
- -29.64%
- 1Y
- -31.68%
- 3Y*
- -17.58%
- 5Y*
- -38.02%
- 10Y*
- —
NAK
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -8.37%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.99%
- 1Y
- 52.71%
- 3Y*
- 110.40%
- 5Y*
- 28.06%
- 10Y*
- 19.65%
SNAP vs. NAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAP Snap Inc. | -29.99% | -25.07% | -36.39% | 89.16% | -80.97% | -6.07% | 206.61% | 196.37% | -62.29% | -39.12% |
NAK Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. | -0.00% | 238.78% | 79.86% | 46.42% | -32.31% | 1.30% | -25.12% | -24.46% | -67.84% | 10.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAP and NAK is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2017 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
SNAP:
$9.54B
NAK:
$1.08B
SNAP:
-$0.24
NAK:
-$0.19
SNAP:
4.57
NAK:
61.12
SNAP:
$6.10B
NAK:
$0.00
SNAP:
$3.40B
NAK:
-$85.85K
SNAP:
-$173.71M
NAK:
-$99.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAP vs. NAK — Risk / Return Rank
SNAP
NAK
SNAP vs. NAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap Inc. (SNAP) and Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNAP | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.20 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 0.78 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 1.34 | -2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNAP | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | 0.46 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 | 0.34 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.20 | -0.01 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
SNAP vs. NAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAP drawdown since its inception was -95.27%, roughly equal to the maximum NAK drawdown of -99.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAP and NAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAP | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.27% | -99.01% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.03% | -67.68% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.48% | -67.68% | -9.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.27% | -67.68% | -27.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -93.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.20% | -90.65% | -2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.01% | -73.92% | +13.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.93% | 39.43% | -5.50% |
Volatility
SNAP vs. NAK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Snap Inc. (SNAP) is 13.84%, while Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) has a volatility of 25.23%. This indicates that SNAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAP | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.84% | 25.23% | -11.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.11% | 77.05% | -35.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.46% | 115.40% | -59.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.99% | 83.77% | -7.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.79% | 97.95% | -26.16% |
Dividends
SNAP vs. NAK - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAP nor NAK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SNAP vs. NAK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snap Inc. and Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAP and NAK have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAK has higher volatility (25.23%) compared to SNAP (13.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAP dropped -95.27% vs NAK's -99.01%.
NAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNAP and NAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer