SNA vs. TSCO
SNA (Snap-on Incorporated) and TSCO (Tractor Supply Company) are both stocks. SNA operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials), while TSCO operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, SNA returned 12.03%/yr vs 6.65%/yr for TSCO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SNA vs. TSCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNA achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than TSCO's -38.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SNA has outperformed TSCO with an annualized return of 12.03%, while TSCO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.65% annualized return.
SNA
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 21.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
TSCO
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- -38.97%
- 6M
- -42.78%
- 1Y
- -39.60%
- 3Y*
- -9.81%
- 5Y*
- -1.88%
- 10Y*
- 6.65%
SNA vs. TSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNA Snap-on Incorporated | 11.92% | 4.28% | 20.67% | 29.70% | 8.91% | 28.83% | 4.03% | 19.54% | -14.86% | 3.64% |
TSCO Tractor Supply Company | -38.97% | -4.16% | 25.43% | -2.55% | -3.97% | 71.57% | 52.33% | 13.53% | 13.34% | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNA and TSCO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 1994 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
SNA:
$19.35
TSCO:
$2.06
SNA:
19.68
TSCO:
14.62
SNA:
2.99
TSCO:
3.20
SNA:
3.93
TSCO:
1.03
SNA:
$5.12B
TSCO:
$15.52B
SNA:
$2.63B
TSCO:
$5.16B
SNA:
$1.47B
TSCO:
$1.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNA vs. TSCO — Risk / Return Rank
SNA
TSCO
SNA vs. TSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) and Tractor Supply Company (TSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNA | TSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.77 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | -0.75 | +3.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.36 | -1.79 | +8.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNA | TSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | -1.30 | +2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | -0.07 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.23 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.43 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
SNA vs. TSCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNA drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, smaller than the maximum TSCO drawdown of -76.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNA and TSCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNA | TSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -76.15% | +10.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.47% | -52.69% | +44.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -52.69% | +31.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -52.69% | +31.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.38% | -52.69% | +5.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -51.07% | +49.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -17.45% | +3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 22.12% | -18.71% |
Volatility
SNA vs. TSCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is 4.71%, while Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) has a volatility of 12.35%. This indicates that SNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNA | TSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 12.35% | -7.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.59% | 26.55% | -11.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.15% | 30.73% | -9.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 28.85% | -4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.19% | 29.41% | -2.22% |
Dividends
SNA vs. TSCO - Dividend Comparison
SNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than TSCO's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNA Snap-on Incorporated | 2.49% | 2.57% | 2.27% | 2.33% | 2.57% | 2.37% | 2.61% | 2.32% | 2.35% | 1.69% | 1.48% | 1.28% |
TSCO Tractor Supply Company | 3.12% | 1.84% | 1.66% | 1.92% | 1.64% | 0.87% | 1.07% | 1.46% | 1.44% | 1.40% | 1.21% | 0.89% |
Financials
SNA vs. TSCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snap-on Incorporated and Tractor Supply Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SNA vs. TSCO - Profitability Comparison
SNA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a gross profit of 608.30M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.4%.
TSCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tractor Supply Company reported a gross profit of 997.97M and revenue of 3.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.6%.
SNA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported an operating income of 250.80M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.
TSCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tractor Supply Company reported an operating income of 297.73M and revenue of 3.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.
SNA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a net income of 247.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 20.5%.
TSCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tractor Supply Company reported a net income of 227.41M and revenue of 3.90B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNA and TSCO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSCO has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to SNA (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNA dropped -65.76% vs TSCO's -76.15%.
SNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNA and TSCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer