PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMSN.L vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SMSN.L vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMSN.L achieves a 149.32% return, which is significantly higher than META's -11.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SMSN.L has outperformed META with an annualized return of 27.10%, while META has yielded a comparatively lower 17.60% annualized return.


SMSN.L

1D
1.28%
1M
5.20%
YTD
149.32%
6M
179.18%
1Y
379.61%
3Y*
57.37%
5Y*
25.51%
10Y*
27.10%

META

1D
-1.28%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
-11.24%
6M
-12.06%
1Y
-15.84%
3Y*
30.58%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
17.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMSN.L vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMSN.L
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
149.32%130.81%-37.94%38.34%-31.32%-8.01%60.01%41.56%-25.35%62.93%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-11.24%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SMSN.L and META is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SMSN.L:

$1.39T

META:

$1.50T

EPS

SMSN.L:

$320.04K

META:

$27.47

PE Ratio

SMSN.L:

0.02

META:

21.31

PEG Ratio

SMSN.L:

0.00

META:

0.88

PS Ratio

SMSN.L:

0.00

META:

7.00

PB Ratio

SMSN.L:

0.00

META:

6.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

SMSN.L:

$389.99T

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SMSN.L:

$152.35T

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

SMSN.L:

$68.67T

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMSN.L vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMSN.L
SMSN.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMSN.L vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMSN.LMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+7.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

0.94

+0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.15

-0.48

+17.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

56.85

-1.01

+57.87

SMSN.L vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio is 7.44, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMSN.L and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMSN.LMETADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.44

-0.45

+7.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.28

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.46

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.54

-0.02

Drawdowns

SMSN.L vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMSN.L drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMSN.L and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMSN.LMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.59%

-76.74%

+21.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.96%

-33.30%

+11.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.52%

-34.15%

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.12%

-76.74%

+27.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.44%

-76.74%

+22.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.96%

-25.73%

+12.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-15.26%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.62%

15.69%

-9.07%

Volatility

SMSN.L vs. META - Volatility Comparison

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) has a higher volatility of 23.24% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 10.48%. This indicates that SMSN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMSN.LMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.24%

10.48%

+12.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.27%

26.95%

+16.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.70%

35.56%

+15.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.66%

44.05%

-9.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.88%

38.69%

-5.81%

Dividends

SMSN.L vs. META - Dividend Comparison

SMSN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than META's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.36%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMSN.L
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
0.37%0.94%2.88%1.79%2.50%1.85%3.60%2.47%3.65%1.62%1.68%1.71%

Financials

SMSN.L vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00T40.00T60.00T80.00T100.00T120.00T140.00T20222023202420252026
133.87T
56.31B
(SMSN.L) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SMSN.L vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
61.2%
81.9%
Portfolio components
SMSN.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 81.91T and revenue of 133.87T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

SMSN.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 58.98T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in an operating margin of 44.1%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

SMSN.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a net income of 48.66T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in a net margin of 36.4%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SMSN.L and META have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMSN.L and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer