SMSN.L vs. APG
SMSN.L (Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd) and APG (APi Group Corporation) are both stocks. SMSN.L operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology), while APG operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, SMSN.L returned 25.51%/yr vs 22.71%/yr for APG. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMSN.L vs. APG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMSN.L achieves a 149.32% return, which is significantly higher than APG's 10.30% return.
SMSN.L
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 149.32%
- 6M
- 179.18%
- 1Y
- 379.61%
- 3Y*
- 57.37%
- 5Y*
- 25.51%
- 10Y*
- 27.10%
APG
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 29.87%
- 3Y*
- 37.01%
- 5Y*
- 22.71%
- 10Y*
- —
SMSN.L vs. APG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 149.32% | 130.81% | -37.94% | 38.34% | -31.32% | -8.01% | 82.16% |
APG APi Group Corporation | 10.30% | 59.55% | 3.96% | 83.94% | -27.01% | 41.98% | 74.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMSN.L and APG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
SMSN.L:
$1.39T
APG:
$18.36B
SMSN.L:
$320.04K
APG:
$0.73
SMSN.L:
0.02
APG:
57.90
SMSN.L:
0.00
APG:
0.12
SMSN.L:
0.00
APG:
2.19
SMSN.L:
0.00
APG:
5.27
SMSN.L:
$389.99T
APG:
$8.17B
SMSN.L:
$152.35T
APG:
$2.57B
SMSN.L:
$68.67T
APG:
$820.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMSN.L vs. APG — Risk / Return Rank
SMSN.L
APG
SMSN.L vs. APG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and APi Group Corporation (APG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMSN.L | APG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.20 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.15 | 1.68 | +15.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 56.85 | 5.22 | +51.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMSN.L | APG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.44 | 1.08 | +6.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.70 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.04 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
SMSN.L vs. APG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMSN.L drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, which is greater than APG's maximum drawdown of -49.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMSN.L and APG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMSN.L | APG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.59% | -49.62% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.96% | -17.83% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.52% | -21.23% | -23.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.12% | -49.62% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.96% | -14.57% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.36% | -10.33% | -7.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 5.74% | +0.88% |
Volatility
SMSN.L vs. APG - Volatility Comparison
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) has a higher volatility of 23.24% compared to APi Group Corporation (APG) at 7.39%. This indicates that SMSN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMSN.L | APG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.24% | 7.39% | +15.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.27% | 22.05% | +21.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.70% | 27.89% | +22.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.66% | 32.53% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.88% | 33.07% | -0.19% |
Dividends
SMSN.L vs. APG - Dividend Comparison
SMSN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while APG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APG APi Group Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 0.37% | 0.94% | 2.88% | 1.79% | 2.50% | 1.85% | 3.60% | 2.47% | 3.65% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.71% |
Financials
SMSN.L vs. APG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd and APi Group Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SMSN.L vs. APG - Profitability Comparison
SMSN.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 81.91T and revenue of 133.87T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.
APG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, APi Group Corporation reported a gross profit of 620.00M and revenue of 1.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
SMSN.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 58.98T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in an operating margin of 44.1%.
APG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, APi Group Corporation reported an operating income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.
SMSN.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a net income of 48.66T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in a net margin of 36.4%.
APG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, APi Group Corporation reported a net income of 51.00M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMSN.L and APG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SMSN.L and APG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer