SMR vs. RSPN
SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) is a stock, while RSPN (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index. Over the past 5 years, SMR returned 1.52%/yr vs 11.25%/yr for RSPN. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMR vs. RSPN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMR achieves a -24.06% return, which is significantly lower than RSPN's 8.05% return.
SMR
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -14.26%
- YTD
- -24.06%
- 6M
- -50.09%
- 1Y
- -68.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.52%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPN
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 8.05%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- 1Y
- 16.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
SMR vs. RSPN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -24.06% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% | -0.89% | 1.71% |
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 8.05% | 13.84% | 17.63% | 22.32% | -8.79% | 26.07% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMR and RSPN is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMR vs. RSPN — Risk / Return Rank
SMR
RSPN
SMR vs. RSPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMR | RSPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.19 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 1.33 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 4.58 | -5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMR | RSPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 1.07 | -1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.62 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.53 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
SMR vs. RSPN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMR drawdown since its inception was -87.47%, which is greater than RSPN's maximum drawdown of -59.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMR and RSPN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMR | RSPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.47% | -59.61% | -27.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.86% | -12.36% | -70.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.86% | -20.89% | -61.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.47% | -21.88% | -65.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.86% | -4.29% | -75.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.97% | -7.67% | -27.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.46% | 3.57% | +52.89% |
Volatility
SMR vs. RSPN - Volatility Comparison
NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a higher volatility of 29.21% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) at 3.63%. This indicates that SMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMR | RSPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.21% | 3.63% | +25.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.12% | 12.15% | +56.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.37% | 15.39% | +88.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.41% | 18.18% | +75.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.34% | 20.36% | +68.98% |
Dividends
SMR vs. RSPN - Dividend Comparison
SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 0.81% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 1.06% | 1.09% | 0.70% | 0.96% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.51% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMR and RSPN have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (29.21%) compared to RSPN (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMR dropped -87.47% vs RSPN's -59.61%.
RSPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMR and RSPN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer