SMR vs. FSENX
SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) is a stock, while FSENX (Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio) is Energy Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, SMR returned 1.52%/yr vs 21.62%/yr for FSENX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMR vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMR achieves a -24.06% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 33.31% return.
SMR
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -14.26%
- YTD
- -24.06%
- 6M
- -50.09%
- 1Y
- -68.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.52%
- 10Y*
- —
FSENX
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 33.31%
- 6M
- 32.07%
- 1Y
- 49.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 21.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
SMR vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -24.06% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% | -0.89% | 1.71% |
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio | 33.31% | 10.56% | 4.26% | 0.94% | 62.98% | 55.31% | -3.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMR and FSENX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | 0.20 |
The correlation between SMR and FSENX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMR vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank
SMR
FSENX
SMR vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMR | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.43 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 5.31 | -6.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 15.48 | -16.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMR | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 2.68 | -3.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.80 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.32 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
SMR vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMR drawdown since its inception was -87.47%, which is greater than FSENX's maximum drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMR and FSENX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMR | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.47% | -76.24% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.86% | -9.95% | -72.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.86% | -25.85% | -57.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.47% | -28.02% | -59.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.86% | -6.29% | -73.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.97% | -17.01% | -17.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.46% | 3.41% | +53.05% |
Volatility
SMR vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison
NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a higher volatility of 29.21% compared to Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) at 7.11%. This indicates that SMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMR | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.21% | 7.11% | +22.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.12% | 15.46% | +53.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.37% | 19.72% | +84.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.41% | 27.28% | +66.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.34% | 30.95% | +58.39% |
Dividends
SMR vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison
SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio | 1.61% | 1.95% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.50% | 2.25% | 3.43% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 1.74% | 0.62% | 1.29% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMR and FSENX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (29.21%) compared to FSENX (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMR dropped -87.47% vs FSENX's -76.24%.
FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMR and FSENX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer