PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMR vs. FSENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMR vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMR achieves a -24.06% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 33.31% return.


SMR

1D
2.48%
1M
-14.26%
YTD
-24.06%
6M
-50.09%
1Y
-68.68%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
1.52%
10Y*

FSENX

1D
-2.51%
1M
2.35%
YTD
33.31%
6M
32.07%
1Y
49.59%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
21.62%
10Y*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMR vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SMR
NuScale Power Corporation
-24.06%-20.97%444.98%-67.93%2.29%-0.89%1.71%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
33.31%10.56%4.26%0.94%62.98%55.31%-3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SMR and FSENX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.20

The correlation between SMR and FSENX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMR vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMR
SMR Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMR Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FSENX
FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMR vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMRFSENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.43

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

5.31

-6.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

15.48

-16.69

SMR vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMR and FSENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMRFSENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

2.68

-3.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.80

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.32

-0.30

Drawdowns

SMR vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMR drawdown since its inception was -87.47%, which is greater than FSENX's maximum drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMR and FSENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMRFSENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.47%

-76.24%

-11.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.86%

-9.95%

-72.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.86%

-25.85%

-57.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.47%

-28.02%

-59.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.86%

-6.29%

-73.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.97%

-17.01%

-17.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.46%

3.41%

+53.05%

Volatility

SMR vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a higher volatility of 29.21% compared to Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) at 7.11%. This indicates that SMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMRFSENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.21%

7.11%

+22.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.12%

15.46%

+53.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.37%

19.72%

+84.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.41%

27.28%

+66.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.34%

30.95%

+58.39%

Dividends

SMR vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
1.61%1.95%1.95%1.98%2.50%2.25%3.43%1.84%1.48%1.74%0.62%1.29%
SMR
NuScale Power Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMR and FSENX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMR has higher volatility (29.21%) compared to FSENX (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMR dropped -87.47% vs FSENX's -76.24%.

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMR and FSENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer