SMR vs. 3191.HK

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) is a stock, while 3191.HK (Global X China Semiconductor ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the Factset China Semiconductor Index. Over the past 5 years, SMR returned 1.52%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for 3191.HK. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SMR vs. 3191.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SMR is traded in USD, while 3191.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 3191.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMR achieves a -24.06% return, which is significantly lower than 3191.HK's 58.16% return.

SMR

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: -14.26%
• YTD: -24.06%
• 6M: -50.09%
• 1Y: -68.68%
• 3Y*: 10.94%
• 5Y*: 1.52%
• 10Y*: —

3191.HK

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 16.98%
• YTD: 58.16%
• 6M: 61.34%
• 1Y: 127.96%
• 3Y*: 31.08%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMR vs. 3191.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SMR NuScale Power Corporation	-24.06%	-20.97%	444.98%	-67.93%	2.29%	-0.89%	1.20%
3191.HK Global X China Semiconductor ETF	58.16%	40.84%	11.71%	-6.55%	-39.35%	18.64%	-0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SMR and 3191.HK is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020	0.07

Return for Risk

SMR vs. 3191.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMR

SMR Risk / Return Rank: 13
SMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SMR Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SMR Martin Ratio Rank: 15

3191.HK

3191.HK Risk / Return Rank: 88
3191.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
3191.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
3191.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 83
3191.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
3191.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMR vs. 3191.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMR	3191.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	3.49	-4.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.89	3.89	-4.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.50	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	6.23	-7.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	15.99	-17.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMR vs. 3191.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the 3191.HK Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMR and 3191.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMR	3191.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.66	3.49	-4.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.25	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.23	-0.22

Drawdowns

SMR vs. 3191.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMR drawdown since its inception was -87.47%, which is greater than 3191.HK's maximum drawdown of -63.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMR and 3191.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMR	3191.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.47%	-63.99%	-23.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.86%	-21.85%	-61.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-82.86%	-40.95%	-41.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.47%	-63.99%	-23.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.86%	-5.69%	-74.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.97%	-34.07%	-0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	56.46%	8.41%	+48.05%

Volatility

SMR vs. 3191.HK - Volatility Comparison

NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a higher volatility of 29.21% compared to Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK) at 16.63%. This indicates that SMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3191.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMR	3191.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.21%	16.63%	+12.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	69.12%	29.10%	+40.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.37%	38.99%	+65.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.41%	40.19%	+53.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.34%	39.53%	+49.81%

Dividends

SMR vs. 3191.HK - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMR nor 3191.HK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMR and 3191.HK in my portfolio?

SMR and 3191.HK have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.