PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMIN.L vs. AVON.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SMIN.L vs. AVON.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Smiths Group PLC (SMIN.L) and Avon Protection plc (AVON.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMIN.L achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly higher than AVON.L's -7.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SMIN.L has outperformed AVON.L with an annualized return of 11.43%, while AVON.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.38% annualized return.


SMIN.L

1D
0.16%
1M
1.41%
YTD
7.39%
6M
7.12%
1Y
15.43%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
11.43%

AVON.L

1D
0.48%
1M
0.36%
YTD
-7.36%
6M
-6.33%
1Y
-4.82%
3Y*
25.44%
5Y*
-7.47%
10Y*
8.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMIN.L vs. AVON.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMIN.L
Smiths Group PLC
7.39%39.71%0.12%13.23%3.97%7.69%-8.47%27.37%-5.41%8.15%
AVON.L
Avon Protection plc
-7.36%24.82%76.14%-17.17%-0.91%-64.25%52.60%69.35%3.63%18.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SMIN.L and AVON.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2006

0.17

The correlation between SMIN.L and AVON.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SMIN.L:

£8.11B

AVON.L:

£511.89M

EPS

SMIN.L:

£1.70

AVON.L:

£0.71

PE Ratio

SMIN.L:

14.81

AVON.L:

23.50

PEG Ratio

SMIN.L:

0.04

AVON.L:

2.93

PS Ratio

SMIN.L:

1.52

AVON.L:

0.90

PB Ratio

SMIN.L:

4.90

AVON.L:

2.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

SMIN.L:

£5.46B

AVON.L:

£570.26M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SMIN.L:

£1.39B

AVON.L:

£232.67M

EBITDA (TTM)

SMIN.L:

£965.00M

AVON.L:

£76.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMIN.L vs. AVON.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIN.L
SMIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SMIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

AVON.L
AVON.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AVON.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVON.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVON.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AVON.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVON.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIN.L vs. AVON.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smiths Group PLC (SMIN.L) and Avon Protection plc (AVON.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMIN.LAVON.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.99

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

-0.16

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.59

-0.33

+2.92

SMIN.L vs. AVON.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the AVON.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIN.L and AVON.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMIN.LAVON.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

-0.18

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

-0.15

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.20

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.33

-0.10

Drawdowns

SMIN.L vs. AVON.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIN.L drawdown since its inception was -60.99%, smaller than the maximum AVON.L drawdown of -87.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIN.L and AVON.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMIN.LAVON.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.99%

-87.02%

+26.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.87%

-29.58%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-32.46%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-78.24%

+55.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.96%

-85.99%

+32.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.02%

-59.11%

+51.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.91%

-29.42%

+11.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.94%

14.54%

-8.60%

Volatility

SMIN.L vs. AVON.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Smiths Group PLC (SMIN.L) is 5.32%, while Avon Protection plc (AVON.L) has a volatility of 10.70%. This indicates that SMIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVON.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMIN.LAVON.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

10.70%

-5.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.35%

20.42%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.17%

27.36%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

48.76%

-26.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.88%

42.38%

-16.50%

Dividends

SMIN.L vs. AVON.L - Dividend Comparison

SMIN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than AVON.L's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVON.L
Avon Protection plc
1.09%1.03%1.21%4.92%3.42%2.53%0.72%0.84%1.08%0.86%0.77%0.62%
SMIN.L
Smiths Group PLC
1.86%1.96%2.55%2.36%2.48%2.39%2.33%2.72%3.27%2.90%2.97%4.36%

Financials

SMIN.L vs. AVON.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smiths Group PLC and Avon Protection plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
915.00M
158.42M
(SMIN.L) Total Revenue
(AVON.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

SMIN.L vs. AVON.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Smiths Group PLC and Avon Protection plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
40.6%
38.7%
Portfolio components
SMIN.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smiths Group PLC reported a gross profit of 371.00M and revenue of 915.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.6%.

AVON.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avon Protection plc reported a gross profit of 61.28M and revenue of 158.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.

SMIN.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smiths Group PLC reported an operating income of 164.00M and revenue of 915.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.

AVON.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avon Protection plc reported an operating income of 21.28M and revenue of 158.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

SMIN.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smiths Group PLC reported a net income of 130.00M and revenue of 915.00M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.

AVON.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avon Protection plc reported a net income of 10.15M and revenue of 158.42M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SMIN.L and AVON.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMIN.L and AVON.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer