PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH vs. TDIV.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMH vs. TDIV.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMH is traded in USD, while TDIV.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the TDIV.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 66.10% return, which is significantly higher than TDIV.AS's 8.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed TDIV.AS with an annualized return of 36.92%, while TDIV.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 12.27% annualized return.


SMH

1D
5.00%
1M
5.58%
YTD
66.10%
6M
62.81%
1Y
137.42%
3Y*
60.43%
5Y*
37.89%
10Y*
36.92%

TDIV.AS

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
8.63%
6M
12.44%
1Y
27.25%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
16.43%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. TDIV.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
66.10%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
8.63%41.12%8.81%14.42%9.20%19.14%-2.22%18.62%-11.46%17.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and TDIV.AS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2016

0.32

The correlation between SMH and TDIV.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMH vs. TDIV.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV.AS
TDIV.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. TDIV.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMHTDIV.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.45

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.26

5.27

+3.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.80

14.77

+20.03

SMH vs. TDIV.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.27, which is higher than the TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and TDIV.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMHTDIV.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.27

2.54

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

1.13

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

0.77

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.79

-0.46

Drawdowns

SMH vs. TDIV.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than TDIV.AS's maximum drawdown of -37.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and TDIV.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHTDIV.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-37.90%

-47.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-5.20%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-14.68%

-21.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

-18.23%

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

-37.90%

-7.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.23%

-2.26%

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.07%

-4.76%

-36.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

1.86%

+2.10%

Volatility

SMH vs. TDIV.AS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) at 2.57%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIV.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMHTDIV.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.45%

2.57%

+12.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.71%

7.88%

+18.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.42%

10.79%

+21.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.32%

14.35%

+20.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.75%

15.67%

+17.08%

SMH vs. TDIV.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV.AS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMH vs. TDIV.AS - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than TDIV.AS's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.19%3.58%4.19%4.98%4.55%3.98%4.12%4.40%4.93%3.95%1.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMH and TDIV.AS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDIV.AS.

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while TDIV.AS is Global Equity Income. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while TDIV.AS tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.38% for TDIV.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH and TDIV.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer