PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH vs. PHAU.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMH vs. PHAU.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC (PHAU.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMH is traded in USD, while PHAU.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PHAU.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 66.10% return, which is significantly higher than PHAU.AS's 3.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed PHAU.AS with an annualized return of 36.92%, while PHAU.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.17% annualized return.


SMH

1D
5.00%
1M
5.58%
YTD
66.10%
6M
62.81%
1Y
137.42%
3Y*
60.43%
5Y*
37.89%
10Y*
36.92%

PHAU.AS

1D
0.67%
1M
-5.29%
YTD
3.40%
6M
5.67%
1Y
33.56%
3Y*
31.15%
5Y*
18.29%
10Y*
13.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. PHAU.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
66.10%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%
PHAU.AS
WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC
3.40%65.08%25.74%12.78%-0.79%-3.43%23.56%18.07%-1.94%12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and PHAU.AS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2007

0.04

The correlation between SMH and PHAU.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMH vs. PHAU.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PHAU.AS
PHAU.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PHAU.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHAU.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHAU.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PHAU.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHAU.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. PHAU.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC (PHAU.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMHPHAU.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.25

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.26

1.82

+7.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.80

4.63

+30.17

SMH vs. PHAU.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.27, which is higher than the PHAU.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and PHAU.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMHPHAU.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.27

1.30

+2.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

1.04

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

0.84

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.57

-0.24

Drawdowns

SMH vs. PHAU.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than PHAU.AS's maximum drawdown of -45.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and PHAU.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHPHAU.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-45.50%

-39.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-17.30%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-17.30%

-18.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

-21.42%

-23.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

-21.75%

-23.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.23%

-15.84%

+9.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.07%

-17.58%

-23.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

6.85%

-2.89%

Volatility

SMH vs. PHAU.AS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC (PHAU.AS) at 5.74%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHAU.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMHPHAU.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.45%

5.74%

+9.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.71%

21.07%

+5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.42%

24.27%

+8.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.32%

17.33%

+17.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.75%

15.50%

+17.25%

SMH vs. PHAU.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PHAU.AS's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMH vs. PHAU.AS - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while PHAU.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHAU.AS
WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMH and PHAU.AS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PHAU.AS.

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while PHAU.AS is Gold. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while PHAU.AS tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.39% for PHAU.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH and PHAU.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer