PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SMH vs. MINV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SMH vs. MINV.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and MINV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while MINV.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 36.92%/yr vs 7.08%/yr for MINV.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

SMH vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMH is traded in USD, while MINV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MINV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 66.10% return, which is significantly higher than MINV.L's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed MINV.L with an annualized return of 36.92%, while MINV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.

SMH

1D
5.00%
1M
5.58%
YTD
66.10%
6M
62.81%
1Y
137.42%
3Y*
60.43%
5Y*
37.89%
10Y*
36.92%

MINV.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.69%
YTD
0.42%
6M
1.74%
1Y
1.41%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		66.10%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF		0.42%11.17%10.98%6.85%-9.59%14.93%1.99%23.61%-2.67%17.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and MINV.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2012

0.30

The correlation between SMH and MINV.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMH vs. MINV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SMH
MINV.L

Technology

100.0%
21.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.9%

Energy

-

4.1%

Financial Services

-

14.0%

Healthcare

-

13.7%

Industrials

-

9.2%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

7.7%

Technology

SMH
100.0%
MINV.L
21.6%

Basic Materials

SMH

-

MINV.L
1.1%

Communication Services

SMH

-

MINV.L
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SMH

-

MINV.L
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

SMH

-

MINV.L
10.9%

Energy

SMH

-

MINV.L
4.1%

Financial Services

SMH

-

MINV.L
14.0%

Healthcare

SMH

-

MINV.L
13.7%

Industrials

SMH

-

MINV.L
9.2%

Real Estate

SMH

-

MINV.L
0.7%

Utilities

SMH

-

MINV.L
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF

Often compared with SMH:
SMH vs. SOXXSMH vs. QQQSMH vs. VGTSMH vs. FSELXSMH vs. SPYSMH vs. SMHXSMH vs. XLK
Often compared with MINV.L:
MINV.L vs. MVEW.LMINV.L vs. CSH2.LMINV.L vs. FULVXMINV.L vs. MVEA.LMINV.L vs. SPYMINV.L vs. VOOMINV.L vs. AOR

Return for Risk

SMH vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
MINV.L
MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SMHMINV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.27
0.18

+4.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.33
0.29

+4.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.04

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.26

0.23

+9.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.80

0.57

+34.23

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMH vs. MINV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.27, which is higher than the MINV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and MINV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SMHMINV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.27

0.18

+4.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

0.28

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

0.46

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.26

+0.07

Drawdowns

SMH vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than MINV.L's maximum drawdown of -39.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and MINV.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SMHMINV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-39.54%

-45.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-6.06%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-19.10%

-16.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

-19.14%

-26.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

-28.90%

-16.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.23%

-4.25%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.07%

-9.78%

-31.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

2.46%

+1.50%

Volatility

SMH vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) at 1.74%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SMHMINV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.45%

1.74%

+13.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.71%

5.71%

+21.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.42%

7.97%

+24.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.32%

17.59%

+17.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.75%

15.54%

+17.21%

SMH vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMH and MINV.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

SMH vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while MINV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

SMH and MINV.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMH and MINV.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while MINV.L is Global Equities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH and MINV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer