SMH vs. GSY
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and GSY (Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while GSY is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco. SMH is passively managed, while GSY is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 36.92%/yr vs 2.86%/yr for GSY. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for GSY.
Performance
SMH vs. GSY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 66.10% return, which is significantly higher than GSY's 1.61% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed GSY with an annualized return of 36.92%, while GSY has yielded a comparatively lower 2.86% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 5.00%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 66.10%
- 6M
- 62.81%
- 1Y
- 137.42%
- 3Y*
- 60.43%
- 5Y*
- 37.89%
- 10Y*
- 36.92%
GSY
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.44%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 2.86%
SMH vs. GSY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 66.10% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
GSY Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF | 1.61% | 4.96% | 5.95% | 5.99% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 1.88% | 3.39% | 2.18% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and GSY is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2008 | 0.00 |
SMH vs. GSY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMH
GSY
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SMH
GSY
Basic Materials
SMH
-
GSY
Communication Services
SMH
-
GSY
Consumer Cyclical
SMH
-
GSY
Consumer Defensive
SMH
-
GSY
Energy
SMH
-
GSY
Financial Services
SMH
-
GSY
Healthcare
SMH
-
GSY
Industrials
SMH
-
GSY
Real Estate
SMH
-
GSY
Utilities
SMH
-
GSY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. GSY — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
GSY
SMH vs. GSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMH | GSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -23.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 6.54 | -4.92 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.26 | 75.72 | -66.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.80 | 373.96 | -339.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMH | GSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27 | 11.26 | -6.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 6.28 | -5.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.13 | 2.35 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.46 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
SMH vs. GSY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than GSY's maximum drawdown of -12.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and GSY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | GSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -12.14% | -72.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -0.06% | -14.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -0.18% | -35.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -1.48% | -43.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -5.25% | -40.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.23% | -0.02% | -6.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.07% | -2.38% | -38.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 0.01% | +3.95% |
Volatility
SMH vs. GSY - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY) at 0.15%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | GSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.45% | 0.15% | +15.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.71% | 0.30% | +26.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.42% | 0.40% | +32.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.32% | 0.58% | +34.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.75% | 1.22% | +31.53% |
SMH vs. GSY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GSY's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. GSY - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than GSY's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSY Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF | 4.34% | 4.56% | 5.31% | 4.95% | 1.70% | 0.58% | 1.45% | 2.71% | 2.30% | 1.80% | 1.21% | 1.17% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and GSY have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to GSY (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs GSY's -12.14%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 36.92% vs 2.86% for GSY. On fees, GSY is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, GSY has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.92% return vs 2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSY is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
GSY has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while GSY is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.22% for GSY.
GSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.26 vs 4.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and GSY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer