SMH vs. CMOD.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and CMOD.L (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while CMOD.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMH returned 37.89%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for CMOD.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for CMOD.L.

Performance

SMH vs. CMOD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 66.10% return, which is significantly higher than CMOD.L's 22.33% return.

SMH

• 1D: 5.00%
• 1M: 5.58%
• YTD: 66.10%
• 6M: 62.81%
• 1Y: 137.42%
• 3Y*: 60.43%
• 5Y*: 37.89%
• 10Y*: 36.92%

CMOD.L

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: 22.33%
• 6M: 22.42%
• 1Y: 33.62%
• 3Y*: 14.20%
• 5Y*: 10.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. CMOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	66.10%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	37.90%
CMOD.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF	22.33%	16.16%	4.12%	-7.56%	14.50%	27.35%	-3.87%	6.64%	-10.22%	2.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and CMOD.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2017	0.11

SMH vs. CMOD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMH	CMOD.L
Technology	100.0%	5.6%
Basic Materials	-	35.8%
Communication Services	-	12.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	9.7%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	17.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	5.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SMH vs. CMOD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CMOD.L

CMOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
CMOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CMOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CMOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CMOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CMOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. CMOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMH	CMOD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.27	1.98	+2.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.33	2.50	+1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.37	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.26	4.60	+4.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	34.80	10.43	+24.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMH vs. CMOD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.27, which is higher than the CMOD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and CMOD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMH	CMOD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.27	1.98	+2.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.08	0.63	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.47	-0.14

Drawdowns

SMH vs. CMOD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than CMOD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and CMOD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMH	CMOD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.96%	-33.16%	-51.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.93%	-7.28%	-7.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.74%	-11.65%	-24.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.30%	-26.86%	-18.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.23%	-7.23%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.07%	-12.25%	-28.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.96%	3.21%	+0.75%

Volatility

SMH vs. CMOD.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) at 5.26%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMH	CMOD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.45%	5.26%	+10.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.71%	15.05%	+11.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.42%	16.91%	+15.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.32%	16.60%	+18.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.75%	14.68%	+18.07%

SMH vs. CMOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CMOD.L's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMH vs. CMOD.L - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while CMOD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMOD.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.18%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMH and CMOD.L in my portfolio?

SMH and CMOD.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMH or CMOD.L?

On fees, CMOD.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMH or CMOD.L?

CMOD.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

What is the main difference between SMH and CMOD.L?

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while CMOD.L is Commodities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while CMOD.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity TR Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.19% for CMOD.L.