PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLV vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLV vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 31.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 14.08%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.02% annualized return.


SLV

1D
0.02%
1M
-15.66%
YTD
-4.41%
6M
16.83%
1Y
88.38%
3Y*
40.36%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
14.08%

XLE

1D
1.14%
1M
4.72%
YTD
31.32%
6M
30.37%
1Y
44.35%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
10.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLV vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-4.41%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
31.32%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SLV and XLE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between SLV and XLE has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SLV vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLV
XLE

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

SLV
100.0%
XLE

-

Communication Services

SLV

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

SLV

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

SLV

-

XLE

-

Energy

SLV

-

XLE
100.0%

Financial Services

SLV

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

SLV

-

XLE

-

Industrials

SLV

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

SLV

-

XLE

-

Technology

SLV

-

XLE

-

Utilities

SLV

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLV vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLV vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLVXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

3.70

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.40

10.59

-6.19

SLV vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLV and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLVXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.18

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.79

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.34

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.31

-0.08

Drawdowns

SLV vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.28%

-71.26%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.45%

-12.05%

-30.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.45%

-20.14%

-22.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.45%

-26.04%

-16.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

-66.81%

+24.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.69%

-6.76%

-34.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.67%

-17.98%

-26.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.15%

4.20%

+15.95%

Volatility

SLV vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.89% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.07%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.89%

7.07%

+9.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.88%

16.58%

+42.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.53%

20.48%

+39.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.33%

26.03%

+10.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.92%

29.58%

+2.34%

SLV vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLV vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.56%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLV and XLE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to XLE (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 14.08% vs 10.02% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 14.08% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

SLV is categorized as Silver, while XLE is Energy Equities. SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLV and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer