SLV vs. VTV
SLV (iShares Silver Trust) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLV returned 14.08%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for VTV. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
SLV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 11.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 14.08%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.42% annualized return.
SLV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -15.66%
- YTD
- -4.41%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 88.38%
- 3Y*
- 40.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
VTV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
SLV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -4.41% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 11.91% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and VTV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006 | 0.19 |
SLV vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLV
VTV
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SLV
VTV
Communication Services
SLV
-
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
SLV
-
VTV
Consumer Defensive
SLV
-
VTV
Energy
SLV
-
VTV
Financial Services
SLV
-
VTV
Healthcare
SLV
-
VTV
Industrials
SLV
-
VTV
Real Estate
SLV
-
VTV
Technology
SLV
-
VTV
Utilities
SLV
-
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
SLV
VTV
SLV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.45 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 4.03 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 15.20 | -10.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 2.52 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.82 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.75 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.51 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
SLV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -59.27% | -17.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.45% | -6.35% | -36.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.45% | -14.52% | -27.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.45% | -17.04% | -25.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.81% | -36.78% | -6.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.69% | -1.11% | -40.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.67% | -7.87% | -36.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.15% | 1.68% | +18.47% |
Volatility
SLV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.89% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.89% | 2.65% | +14.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.88% | 7.67% | +51.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.53% | 10.18% | +49.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.33% | 13.89% | +22.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.92% | 16.68% | +15.24% |
SLV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLV and VTV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 14.08% vs 12.42% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 14.08% return vs 12.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
SLV is categorized as Silver, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLV and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer