PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLV vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLV vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than VOOG's 10.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has underperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 14.08%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.80% annualized return.


SLV

1D
0.02%
1M
-15.66%
YTD
-4.41%
6M
16.83%
1Y
88.38%
3Y*
40.36%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
14.08%

VOOG

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
10.10%
6M
9.55%
1Y
29.06%
3Y*
26.66%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
17.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLV vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-4.41%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
10.10%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SLV and VOOG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.18

SLV vs. VOOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLV
VOOG

Basic Materials

100.0%
0.4%

Communication Services

-

18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

8.8%

Healthcare

-

5.8%

Industrials

-

6.2%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

-

49.4%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Basic Materials

SLV
100.0%
VOOG
0.4%

Communication Services

SLV

-

VOOG
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SLV

-

VOOG
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

SLV

-

VOOG
1.0%

Energy

SLV

-

VOOG
0.1%

Financial Services

SLV

-

VOOG
8.8%

Healthcare

SLV

-

VOOG
5.8%

Industrials

SLV

-

VOOG
6.2%

Real Estate

SLV

-

VOOG
0.6%

Technology

SLV

-

VOOG
49.4%

Utilities

SLV

-

VOOG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLV vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLV vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLVVOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.13

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.40

8.74

-4.34

SLV vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLV and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLVVOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.79

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.72

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.86

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.89

-0.66

Drawdowns

SLV vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.28%

-32.73%

-43.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.45%

-13.71%

-28.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.45%

-22.18%

-20.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.45%

-32.73%

-9.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

-32.73%

-10.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.69%

-4.28%

-37.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.67%

-4.97%

-39.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.15%

3.33%

+16.82%

Volatility

SLV vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.89% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) at 5.61%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.89%

5.61%

+11.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.88%

13.04%

+45.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.53%

16.31%

+43.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.33%

21.25%

+15.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.92%

20.77%

+11.15%

SLV vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLV vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLV and VOOG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to VOOG (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 17.80% vs 14.08% for SLV. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOG has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 17.80% return vs 14.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

VOOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

SLV is categorized as Silver, while VOOG is S&P 500. SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price, while VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.07% for VOOG.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLV and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer