SLV vs. RKLB
SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while RKLB (Rocket Lab USA, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SLV returned 40.36%/yr vs 179.23%/yr for RKLB. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLV vs. RKLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than RKLB's 62.92% return.
SLV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -15.66%
- YTD
- -4.41%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 88.38%
- 3Y*
- 40.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
RKLB
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- 7.76%
- YTD
- 62.92%
- 6M
- 120.42%
- 1Y
- 292.98%
- 3Y*
- 179.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV vs. RKLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -4.41% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -1.69% |
RKLB Rocket Lab USA, Inc. | 62.92% | 173.89% | 360.58% | 46.68% | -69.30% | 8.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and RKLB is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2021 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLV vs. RKLB — Risk / Return Rank
SLV
RKLB
SLV vs. RKLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLV | RKLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.39 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 6.86 | -4.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 15.94 | -11.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLV | RKLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 3.20 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.76 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
SLV vs. RKLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, smaller than the maximum RKLB drawdown of -82.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and RKLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLV | RKLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -82.96% | +6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.45% | -43.01% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.45% | -55.49% | +13.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.69% | -24.35% | -17.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.67% | -51.40% | +6.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.15% | 18.48% | +1.67% |
Volatility
SLV vs. RKLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) is 16.89%, while Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB) has a volatility of 41.86%. This indicates that SLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RKLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLV | RKLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.89% | 41.86% | -24.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.88% | 72.23% | -13.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.53% | 92.32% | -32.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.33% | 81.48% | -45.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.92% | 81.48% | -49.56% |
Dividends
SLV vs. RKLB - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLV nor RKLB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLV and RKLB have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RKLB has higher volatility (41.86%) compared to SLV (16.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs RKLB's -82.96%.
RKLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLV and RKLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer