SLV vs. IOO
SLV (iShares Silver Trust) and IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while IOO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLV returned 14.08%/yr vs 16.53%/yr for IOO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IOO.
Performance
SLV vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has underperformed IOO with an annualized return of 14.08%, while IOO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.53% annualized return.
SLV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -15.66%
- YTD
- -4.41%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 88.38%
- 3Y*
- 40.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
IOO
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 16.11%
- 10Y*
- 16.53%
SLV vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -4.41% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 9.70% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 27.71% | -16.34% | 26.03% | 18.61% | 30.01% | -6.22% | 23.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and IOO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006 | 0.26 |
SLV vs. IOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLV
IOO
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SLV
IOO
Communication Services
SLV
-
IOO
Consumer Cyclical
SLV
-
IOO
Consumer Defensive
SLV
-
IOO
Energy
SLV
-
IOO
Financial Services
SLV
-
IOO
Healthcare
SLV
-
IOO
Industrials
SLV
-
IOO
Real Estate
SLV
-
IOO
Technology
SLV
-
IOO
Utilities
SLV
-
IOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLV vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank
SLV
IOO
SLV vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLV | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.44 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 3.41 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 15.65 | -11.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLV | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 2.45 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.95 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.93 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.39 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
SLV vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than IOO's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and IOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLV | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -55.85% | -20.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.45% | -9.94% | -32.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.45% | -19.19% | -23.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.45% | -23.52% | -18.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.81% | -31.43% | -11.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.69% | -3.57% | -38.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.67% | -11.27% | -33.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.15% | 2.16% | +17.99% |
Volatility
SLV vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.89% compared to iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 4.47%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLV | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.89% | 4.47% | +12.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.88% | 11.04% | +47.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.53% | 13.88% | +45.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.33% | 17.09% | +19.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.92% | 17.80% | +14.12% |
SLV vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLV vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLV and IOO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to IOO (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs IOO's -55.85%.
On 10-year performance, IOO leads with 16.53% vs 14.08% for SLV. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.53% return vs 14.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
SLV is categorized as Silver, while IOO is Global Equities. SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price, while IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.40% for IOO.
IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLV and IOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer