SLQD vs. VT
SLQD (iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLQD returned 2.63%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for VT. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.06% expense ratio.
Performance
SLQD vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLQD achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SLQD has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 2.63%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.61% annualized return.
SLQD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.63%
VT
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
SLQD vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.73% | 6.27% | 4.94% | 5.98% | -4.38% | -0.61% | 4.76% | 6.09% | 1.09% | 2.12% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 9.77% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLQD and VT is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2013 | 0.14 |
Over the past year, SLQD and VT have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLQD vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
SLQD
VT
SLQD vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLQD | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.36 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 2.64 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.25 | 11.68 | +7.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLQD | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.04 | 1.96 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.66 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.73 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.43 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
SLQD vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLQD drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLQD and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLQD | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -50.27% | +37.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.06% | -9.67% | +8.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.06% | -16.51% | +15.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.63% | -26.38% | +18.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.69% | -34.24% | +21.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -3.06% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -7.02% | +6.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 2.19% | -1.96% |
Volatility
SLQD vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) is 0.51%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that SLQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLQD | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 4.55% | -4.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.12% | 10.67% | -9.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49% | 13.10% | -11.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.44% | 16.10% | -13.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.14% | 17.26% | -14.12% |
SLQD vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SLQD and VT have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLQD vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
SLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than VT's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.33% | 4.15% | 3.71% | 2.99% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.34% | 2.89% | 2.55% | 1.98% | 1.81% | 1.43% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLQD and VT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to SLQD (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLQD dropped -12.69% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.61% vs 2.63% for SLQD. Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. On volatility, SLQD has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLQD and VT have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.
SLQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 1.63% for VT.
SLQD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VT is Global Equities. SLQD tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.
SLQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLQD and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer