SLB vs. AKO-A
SLB (Schlumberger Limited) and AKO-A (Embotelladora Andina S.A) are both stocks. SLB operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while AKO-A operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, SLB returned -0.41%/yr vs 8.38%/yr for AKO-A. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLB vs. AKO-A - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLB achieves a 48.99% return, which is significantly higher than AKO-A's -10.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SLB has underperformed AKO-A with an annualized return of -0.41%, while AKO-A has yielded a comparatively higher 8.38% annualized return.
SLB
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- YTD
- 48.99%
- 6M
- 49.53%
- 1Y
- 71.52%
- 3Y*
- 8.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- -0.41%
AKO-A
- 1D
- -11.01%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -10.20%
- 6M
- -8.49%
- 1Y
- 4.96%
- 3Y*
- 25.94%
- 5Y*
- 21.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
SLB vs. AKO-A - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 48.99% | 3.27% | -24.47% | -0.78% | 81.15% | 40.30% | -43.81% | 17.73% | -44.66% | -17.37% |
AKO-A Embotelladora Andina S.A | -10.20% | 69.94% | 22.39% | 32.28% | 25.25% | -15.56% | -9.03% | -14.12% | -25.96% | 33.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLB and AKO-A is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 1994 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
SLB:
$3.04
AKO-A:
$1.95K
SLB:
18.57
AKO-A:
0.01
SLB:
0.87
AKO-A:
0.00
SLB:
1.71
AKO-A:
0.00
SLB:
$35.94B
AKO-A:
$3.42T
SLB:
$4.90B
AKO-A:
$1.34T
SLB:
$5.30B
AKO-A:
$620.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLB vs. AKO-A — Risk / Return Rank
SLB
AKO-A
SLB vs. AKO-A - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLB | AKO-A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.08 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.03 | 0.22 | +4.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.70 | 0.55 | +12.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLB | AKO-A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 0.10 | +2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.52 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 | 0.20 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.20 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
SLB vs. AKO-A - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLB drawdown since its inception was -87.64%, which is greater than AKO-A's maximum drawdown of -79.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLB and AKO-A.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLB | AKO-A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.64% | -79.18% | -8.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -22.40% | +8.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.63% | -25.41% | -21.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.63% | -25.41% | -21.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.29% | -63.51% | -20.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.09% | -22.40% | -10.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.18% | -30.92% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.65% | 9.07% | -3.42% |
Volatility
SLB vs. AKO-A - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) is 9.86%, while Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A) has a volatility of 16.27%. This indicates that SLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AKO-A based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLB | AKO-A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.86% | 16.27% | -6.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.96% | 41.68% | -15.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.98% | 52.00% | -18.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.66% | 42.35% | -4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.43% | 41.97% | -1.54% |
Dividends
SLB vs. AKO-A - Dividend Comparison
SLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than AKO-A's 5.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKO-A Embotelladora Andina S.A | 5.09% | 5.24% | 6.95% | 9.27% | 17.81% | 8.12% | 5.74% | 4.72% | 4.16% | 2.63% | 2.34% | 2.50% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 2.05% | 2.97% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% |
Financials
SLB vs. AKO-A - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Schlumberger Limited and Embotelladora Andina S.A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLB vs. AKO-A - Profitability Comparison
SLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AKO-A - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a gross profit of 393.07B and revenue of 958.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.
SLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
AKO-A - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported an operating income of 147.46B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
SLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a net income of 752.00M and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
AKO-A - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a net income of 102.93B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLB and AKO-A have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AKO-A has higher volatility (16.27%) compared to SLB (9.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLB dropped -87.64% vs AKO-A's -79.18%.
SLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLB and AKO-A
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer