SIRI vs. CLF
SIRI (Sirius XM Holdings Inc.) and CLF (Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.) are both stocks. SIRI operates in Broadcasting (Communication Services), while CLF operates in Steel (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, SIRI returned -1.34%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for CLF. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIRI vs. CLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIRI achieves a 40.39% return, which is significantly higher than CLF's -4.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SIRI has underperformed CLF with an annualized return of -1.34%, while CLF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.
SIRI
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 40.39%
- 6M
- 29.18%
- 1Y
- 30.91%
- 3Y*
- -6.89%
- 5Y*
- -13.63%
- 10Y*
- -1.34%
CLF
- 1D
- -6.28%
- 1M
- 15.06%
- YTD
- -4.52%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 66.84%
- 3Y*
- -7.46%
- 5Y*
- -11.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
SIRI vs. CLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIRI Sirius XM Holdings Inc. | 40.39% | -7.97% | -56.93% | -4.27% | -3.21% | 0.74% | -10.11% | 26.24% | 7.28% | 21.42% |
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | -4.52% | 41.28% | -53.97% | 26.75% | -26.00% | 49.52% | 77.38% | 12.72% | 6.66% | -14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIRI and CLF is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 1994 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
SIRI:
$9.27B
CLF:
$7.16B
SIRI:
$2.41
CLF:
-$2.37
SIRI:
1.12
CLF:
0.34
SIRI:
0.79
CLF:
1.23
SIRI:
$8.58B
CLF:
$18.90B
SIRI:
$4.10B
CLF:
-$528.00M
SIRI:
$1.77B
CLF:
$134.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIRI vs. CLF — Risk / Return Rank
SIRI
CLF
SIRI vs. CLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIRI | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.30 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 2.68 | +0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIRI | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.98 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | -0.19 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 | 0.16 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.13 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
SIRI vs. CLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIRI drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, roughly equal to the maximum CLF drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIRI and CLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIRI | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -98.78% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -51.67% | +34.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.87% | -74.46% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.87% | -82.37% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.87% | -82.37% | +8.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.76% | -87.07% | -7.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.54% | -47.61% | -32.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.83% | 25.01% | -16.18% |
Volatility
SIRI vs. CLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) is 10.37%, while Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a volatility of 20.72%. This indicates that SIRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIRI | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.37% | 20.72% | -10.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.99% | 46.41% | -22.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.66% | 68.41% | -32.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.95% | 59.53% | -14.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.69% | 62.05% | -24.36% |
Dividends
SIRI vs. CLF - Dividend Comparison
SIRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, while CLF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIRI Sirius XM Holdings Inc. | 3.94% | 5.40% | 4.68% | 1.81% | 5.82% | 1.04% | 0.86% | 0.69% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.22% |
Financials
SIRI vs. CLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sirius XM Holdings Inc. and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SIRI vs. CLF - Profitability Comparison
SIRI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 2.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.6%.
CLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported a gross profit of -82.00M and revenue of 4.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.7%.
SIRI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 454.00M and revenue of 2.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
CLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported an operating income of -207.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.2%.
SIRI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 245.00M and revenue of 2.09B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
CLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported a net income of -237.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in a net margin of -4.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIRI and CLF have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLF has higher volatility (20.72%) compared to SIRI (10.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIRI dropped -99.92% vs CLF's -98.78%.
CLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIRI and CLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer