PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIMO vs. OLED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SIMO vs. OLED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Universal Display Corporation (OLED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMO achieves a 185.61% return, which is significantly higher than OLED's -23.54% return. Over the past 10 years, SIMO has outperformed OLED with an annualized return of 22.37%, while OLED has yielded a comparatively lower 3.20% annualized return.


SIMO

1D
1.74%
1M
3.79%
YTD
185.61%
6M
185.14%
1Y
299.59%
3Y*
58.66%
5Y*
35.39%
10Y*
22.37%

OLED

1D
3.15%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
-23.54%
6M
-26.66%
1Y
-40.39%
3Y*
-13.73%
5Y*
-15.39%
10Y*
3.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIMO vs. OLED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
185.61%76.91%-8.94%-4.91%-30.38%101.83%-1.81%51.81%-33.11%27.14%
OLED
Universal Display Corporation
-23.54%-19.07%-22.88%78.64%-33.87%-27.89%11.91%120.74%-45.69%206.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SIMO and OLED is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2005

0.33

The correlation between SIMO and OLED shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SIMO:

$2.23B

OLED:

$4.19B

EPS

SIMO:

$17.93

OLED:

$4.49

PE Ratio

SIMO:

14.68

OLED:

19.78

PEG Ratio

SIMO:

0.11

OLED:

2.71

PS Ratio

SIMO:

2.22

OLED:

6.74

PB Ratio

SIMO:

2.46

OLED:

2.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

SIMO:

$997.60M

OLED:

$626.55M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SIMO:

$485.91M

OLED:

$465.05M

EBITDA (TTM)

SIMO:

$146.89M

OLED:

$277.56M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIMO vs. OLED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMO
SIMO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SIMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIMO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
SIMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIMO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

OLED
OLED Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
OLED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OLED Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OLED Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
OLED Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
OLED Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIMO vs. OLED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Universal Display Corporation (OLED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIMOOLEDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

0.82

+0.83

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.49

-0.88

+12.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.72

-1.52

+36.23

SIMO vs. OLED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIMO Sharpe Ratio is 4.33, which is higher than the OLED Sharpe Ratio of -1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIMO and OLED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIMOOLEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.33

-1.06

+5.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

-0.35

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.07

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.14

+0.21

Drawdowns

SIMO vs. OLED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMO drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than OLED's maximum drawdown of -85.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMO and OLED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIMOOLEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.19%

-85.55%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.26%

-45.99%

+19.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.84%

-62.74%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.49%

-62.74%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.49%

-65.20%

+8.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.14%

-64.11%

+49.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.38%

-45.19%

+12.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.68%

26.64%

-17.96%

Volatility

SIMO vs. OLED - Volatility Comparison

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) has a higher volatility of 24.02% compared to Universal Display Corporation (OLED) at 11.17%. This indicates that SIMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OLED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIMOOLEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.02%

11.17%

+12.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.44%

29.29%

+28.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.82%

38.14%

+31.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.19%

43.81%

+6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.17%

47.45%

-2.28%

Dividends

SIMO vs. OLED - Dividend Comparison

SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than OLED's 2.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OLED
Universal Display Corporation
2.08%1.54%1.09%0.73%1.11%0.48%0.26%0.19%0.26%0.07%0.00%0.00%
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
0.76%2.16%3.70%0.82%2.31%1.62%2.89%2.45%3.45%1.68%1.51%1.88%

Financials

SIMO vs. OLED - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Universal Display Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
278.46M
142.21M
(SIMO) Total Revenue
(OLED) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SIMO vs. OLED - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Universal Display Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
49.1%
74.6%
Portfolio components
SIMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 136.77M and revenue of 278.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

OLED - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported a gross profit of 106.09M and revenue of 142.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.

SIMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 31.71M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

OLED - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported an operating income of 42.75M and revenue of 142.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.

SIMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a net income of 47.75M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.

OLED - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported a net income of 35.90M and revenue of 142.21M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SIMO and OLED have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIMO has higher volatility (24.02%) compared to OLED (11.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIMO dropped -93.19% vs OLED's -85.55%.

SIMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.33 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIMO and OLED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer