SIEGY vs. CHAT
SIEGY (Siemens Aktiengesellschaft) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, SIEGY returned 24.82%/yr vs 50.33%/yr for CHAT. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SIEGY vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIEGY achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 58.75% return.
SIEGY
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 12.35%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- 24.82%
- 5Y*
- 15.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
CHAT
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 8.61%
- YTD
- 58.75%
- 6M
- 54.05%
- 1Y
- 117.08%
- 3Y*
- 50.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIEGY vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SIEGY Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | 12.35% | 48.14% | 6.32% | 9.84% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 58.75% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIEGY and CHAT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.50 |
The correlation between SIEGY and CHAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIEGY vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
SIEGY
CHAT
SIEGY vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (SIEGY) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIEGY | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.54 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 7.23 | -6.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 21.00 | -17.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIEGY | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 3.63 | -2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 1.78 | -1.37 |
Drawdowns
SIEGY vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIEGY drawdown since its inception was -54.15%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIEGY and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIEGY | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.15% | -31.34% | -22.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -16.28% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.91% | -31.34% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -9.52% | +4.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.84% | -5.36% | -7.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.10% | 5.60% | +1.50% |
Volatility
SIEGY vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (SIEGY) is 9.22%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 15.95%. This indicates that SIEGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIEGY | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | 15.95% | -6.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.87% | 27.06% | -1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.64% | 32.47% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.69% | 30.45% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 30.45% | -0.88% |
Dividends
SIEGY vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
SIEGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than CHAT's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.80% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIEGY Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | 2.06% | 1.94% | 2.64% | 2.43% | 2.42% | 1.81% | 10.83% | 2.44% | 2.86% | 6.82% | 5.76% | 2.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIEGY and CHAT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAT has higher volatility (15.95%) compared to SIEGY (9.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIEGY dropped -54.15% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIEGY and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer