SHY vs. PCY
SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and PCY (Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHY is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while PCY is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the DB Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SHY returned 1.63%/yr vs 2.55%/yr for PCY. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PCY.
Performance
SHY vs. PCY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHY achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than PCY's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SHY has underperformed PCY with an annualized return of 1.63%, while PCY has yielded a comparatively higher 2.55% annualized return.
SHY
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.04%
- 5Y*
- 1.70%
- 10Y*
- 1.63%
PCY
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 13.56%
- 3Y*
- 10.81%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
SHY vs. PCY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHY iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 0.34% | 4.95% | 3.92% | 4.16% | -3.88% | -0.71% | 3.03% | 3.38% | 1.46% | 0.26% |
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | 1.26% | 16.31% | 2.55% | 18.48% | -24.47% | -4.30% | 2.29% | 17.66% | -6.16% | 9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHY and PCY is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007 | 0.23 |
Over the past year, SHY and PCY have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHY vs. PCY — Risk / Return Rank
SHY
PCY
SHY vs. PCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) and Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHY | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.34 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 2.31 | +1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.12 | 9.34 | +5.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHY | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 1.83 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.08 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 0.20 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.29 | +0.99 |
Drawdowns
SHY vs. PCY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHY drawdown since its inception was -5.71%, smaller than the maximum PCY drawdown of -49.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHY and PCY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHY | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -49.13% | +43.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.89% | -5.91% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.97% | -11.52% | +10.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.71% | -37.17% | +31.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.71% | -37.78% | +32.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -1.23% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -6.97% | +6.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 1.46% | -1.24% |
Volatility
SHY vs. PCY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) is 0.38%, while Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) has a volatility of 2.20%. This indicates that SHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHY | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 2.20% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.95% | 5.83% | -4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33% | 7.46% | -6.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.99% | 13.17% | -11.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.57% | 12.95% | -11.38% |
SHY vs. PCY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PCY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHY vs. PCY - Dividend Comparison
SHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than PCY's 5.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | 5.91% | 5.93% | 6.65% | 6.48% | 6.81% | 4.80% | 4.45% | 4.78% | 4.93% | 4.80% | 5.19% | 5.46% |
SHY iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.69% | 3.81% | 3.92% | 2.99% | 1.30% | 0.26% | 0.94% | 2.12% | 1.72% | 0.98% | 0.71% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHY and PCY have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCY has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to SHY (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHY dropped -5.71% vs PCY's -49.13%.
On 10-year performance, PCY leads with 2.55% vs 1.63% for SHY. On fees, SHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PCY has performed better with a 2.55% return vs 1.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PCY.
PCY has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 3.69% for SHY.
SHY is categorized as Government Bonds, while PCY is Emerging Markets Bonds. SHY tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while PCY tracks DB Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SHY and 0.50% for PCY.
SHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHY and PCY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer