SHW vs. XLV
SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) is a stock, while XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, SHW returned 12.93%/yr vs 9.65%/yr for XLV. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SHW vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHW achieves a -7.11% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's -0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SHW has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 12.93%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.
SHW
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- -7.11%
- 6M
- -7.99%
- 1Y
- -15.42%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
SHW vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | -7.11% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.98% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHW and XLV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998 | 0.46 |
The correlation between SHW and XLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHW vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
SHW
XLV
SHW vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHW | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.19 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 1.50 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 3.60 | -5.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHW | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 1.05 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.41 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.58 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.46 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
SHW vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHW drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHW and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHW | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -39.17% | -12.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.36% | -10.47% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.69% | -17.11% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.46% | -17.11% | -25.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.46% | -28.40% | -14.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.03% | -4.32% | -19.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -7.12% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.16% | 4.35% | +5.81% |
Volatility
SHW vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 5.02%. This indicates that SHW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHW | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 5.02% | +1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.56% | 10.66% | +7.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.80% | 14.99% | +9.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 14.76% | +11.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.53% | 16.58% | +9.95% |
Dividends
SHW vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than XLV's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 1.06% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.64% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHW and XLV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHW has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to XLV (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHW dropped -52.02% vs XLV's -39.17%.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHW and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer