PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHEL vs. WPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SHEL vs. WPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shell plc (SHEL) and WPP plc (WPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHEL achieves a 20.10% return, which is significantly higher than WPP's -20.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SHEL has outperformed WPP with an annualized return of 10.03%, while WPP has yielded a comparatively lower -12.62% annualized return.


SHEL

1D
1.46%
1M
4.13%
YTD
20.10%
6M
21.39%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
23.01%
10Y*
10.03%

WPP

1D
-1.36%
1M
-5.37%
YTD
-20.08%
6M
-9.61%
1Y
-51.45%
3Y*
-27.77%
5Y*
-20.45%
10Y*
-12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHEL vs. WPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHEL
Shell plc
20.10%22.16%-0.87%20.19%36.18%34.27%-41.08%6.38%-7.23%21.67%
WPP
WPP plc
-20.08%-53.53%13.55%1.49%-31.96%43.52%-17.24%36.53%-36.30%-14.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SHEL and WPP is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2005

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between SHEL and WPP has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SHEL:

$247.11B

WPP:

$3.75B

EPS

SHEL:

$6.39

WPP:

$1.51

PE Ratio

SHEL:

13.55

WPP:

11.58

PEG Ratio

SHEL:

0.68

WPP:

0.15

PS Ratio

SHEL:

0.95

WPP:

0.13

PB Ratio

SHEL:

1.42

WPP:

1.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

SHEL:

$266.82B

WPP:

$28.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SHEL:

$41.65B

WPP:

$4.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

SHEL:

$57.44B

WPP:

$2.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHEL vs. WPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHEL
SHEL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SHEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHEL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SHEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHEL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

WPP
WPP Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
WPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
WPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPP Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHEL vs. WPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shell plc (SHEL) and WPP plc (WPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHELWPPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.79

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

-0.87

+3.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.40

-1.22

+9.62

SHEL vs. WPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHEL Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the WPP Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHEL and WPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHELWPPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

-1.07

+2.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

-0.59

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

-0.36

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.01

+0.21

Drawdowns

SHEL vs. WPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHEL drawdown since its inception was -71.57%, smaller than the maximum WPP drawdown of -95.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHEL and WPP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHELWPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.57%

-95.30%

+23.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.81%

-59.39%

+48.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.47%

-71.59%

+53.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-77.69%

+52.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.57%

-79.99%

+8.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.13%

-76.22%

+69.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.74%

-42.50%

+25.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

42.31%

-38.46%

Volatility

SHEL vs. WPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Shell plc (SHEL) is 5.98%, while WPP plc (WPP) has a volatility of 13.71%. This indicates that SHEL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHELWPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

13.71%

-7.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.50%

32.91%

-15.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.15%

48.22%

-27.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.22%

34.80%

-9.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.84%

35.12%

-4.28%

Dividends

SHEL vs. WPP - Dividend Comparison

SHEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than WPP's 5.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHEL
Shell plc
3.41%3.90%4.39%3.76%3.48%3.78%5.69%6.27%6.27%2.75%6.49%8.17%
WPP
WPP plc
5.79%9.09%4.85%5.09%4.38%2.45%5.66%5.47%7.35%4.32%3.01%2.81%

Financials

SHEL vs. WPP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shell plc and WPP plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
69.57B
6.89B
(SHEL) Total Revenue
(WPP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SHEL vs. WPP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Shell plc and WPP plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%20222023202420252026
19.1%
19.0%
Portfolio components
SHEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported a gross profit of 13.31B and revenue of 69.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

WPP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported a gross profit of 1.31B and revenue of 6.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

SHEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported an operating income of 10.35B and revenue of 69.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

WPP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported an operating income of 161.00M and revenue of 6.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

SHEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported a net income of 5.68B and revenue of 69.57B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.

WPP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported a net income of -259.00M and revenue of 6.89B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SHEL and WPP have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WPP has higher volatility (13.71%) compared to SHEL (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHEL dropped -71.57% vs WPP's -95.30%.

SHEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHEL and WPP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer