PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHEL vs. TATYY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SHEL vs. TATYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shell plc (SHEL) and Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHEL achieves a 20.10% return, which is significantly lower than TATYY's 47.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SHEL has outperformed TATYY with an annualized return of 10.03%, while TATYY has yielded a comparatively lower 3.54% annualized return.


SHEL

1D
1.46%
1M
4.13%
YTD
20.10%
6M
21.39%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
23.01%
10Y*
10.03%

TATYY

1D
12.60%
1M
46.04%
YTD
47.55%
6M
53.00%
1Y
1.87%
3Y*
-5.92%
5Y*
-1.47%
10Y*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHEL vs. TATYY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHEL
Shell plc
20.10%22.16%-0.87%20.19%36.18%34.27%-41.08%6.38%-7.23%21.67%
TATYY
Tate & Lyle PLC ADR
47.55%-35.21%-0.61%-0.36%18.05%-0.65%-1.93%19.27%-4.33%9.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SHEL and TATYY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.11

The correlation between SHEL and TATYY shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.12 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SHEL:

$247.11B

TATYY:

$3.34B

EPS

SHEL:

$6.39

TATYY:

$2.15

PE Ratio

SHEL:

13.55

TATYY:

13.88

PS Ratio

SHEL:

0.95

TATYY:

0.94

PB Ratio

SHEL:

1.42

TATYY:

2.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

SHEL:

$266.82B

TATYY:

$3.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SHEL:

$41.65B

TATYY:

$722.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

SHEL:

$57.44B

TATYY:

$597.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHEL vs. TATYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHEL
SHEL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SHEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHEL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SHEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHEL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

TATYY
TATYY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TATYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TATYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TATYY Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TATYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TATYY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHEL vs. TATYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shell plc (SHEL) and Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHELTATYYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.08

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

0.05

+2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.40

0.07

+8.33

SHEL vs. TATYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHEL Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the TATYY Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHEL and TATYY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHELTATYYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

0.03

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

-0.04

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.10

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.11

+0.11

Drawdowns

SHEL vs. TATYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHEL drawdown since its inception was -71.57%, which is greater than TATYY's maximum drawdown of -57.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHEL and TATYY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHELTATYYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.57%

-57.06%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.81%

-40.33%

+29.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.47%

-57.06%

+38.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-57.06%

+32.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.57%

-57.06%

-14.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.13%

-27.33%

+20.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.74%

-15.57%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

26.06%

-22.21%

Volatility

SHEL vs. TATYY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Shell plc (SHEL) is 5.98%, while Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) has a volatility of 39.19%. This indicates that SHEL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TATYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHELTATYYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

39.19%

-33.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.50%

44.51%

-27.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.15%

57.38%

-36.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.22%

38.13%

-12.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.84%

34.16%

-3.32%

Dividends

SHEL vs. TATYY - Dividend Comparison

SHEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than TATYY's 3.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHEL
Shell plc
3.41%3.90%4.39%3.76%3.48%3.78%5.69%6.27%6.27%2.75%6.49%8.17%
TATYY
Tate & Lyle PLC ADR
3.57%5.27%3.03%2.90%19.44%4.72%3.74%3.67%4.18%3.64%3.81%0.00%

Financials

SHEL vs. TATYY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shell plc and Tate & Lyle PLC ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
69.57B
996.75M
(SHEL) Total Revenue
(TATYY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SHEL vs. TATYY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Shell plc and Tate & Lyle PLC ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
19.1%
0
Portfolio components
SHEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported a gross profit of 13.31B and revenue of 69.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

TATYY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 996.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SHEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported an operating income of 10.35B and revenue of 69.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

TATYY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported an operating income of 83.23M and revenue of 996.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

SHEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported a net income of 5.68B and revenue of 69.57B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.

TATYY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a net income of 41.62M and revenue of 996.75M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SHEL and TATYY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TATYY has higher volatility (39.19%) compared to SHEL (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHEL dropped -71.57% vs TATYY's -57.06%.

SHEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHEL and TATYY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer