SGOV vs. GPIQ
SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. SGOV is passively managed, while GPIQ is actively managed. Over the past year, SGOV returned 3.95% vs 33.04% for GPIQ. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SGOV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.
Performance
SGOV vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGOV achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 14.88% return.
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- —
GPIQ
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGOV vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 1.56% | 4.24% | 5.27% | 0.94% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 14.88% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGOV and GPIQ is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | -0.01 |
The correlation between SGOV and GPIQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGOV vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
SGOV
GPIQ
SGOV vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGOV | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +17.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +272.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 195.55 | 1.43 | +194.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 398.20 | 3.49 | +394.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4,461.99 | 15.21 | +4,446.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGOV | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.28 | 2.36 | +17.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 14.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 12.50 | 1.67 | +10.83 |
Drawdowns
SGOV vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOV drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOV and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGOV | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -21.06% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -9.51% | +9.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.08% | +3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -2.27% | +2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 2.18% | -2.18% |
Volatility
SGOV vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) is 0.06%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that SGOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGOV | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | 5.54% | -5.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.13% | 11.32% | -11.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 14.07% | -13.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.24% | 17.63% | -17.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.24% | 17.63% | -17.39% |
SGOV vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGOV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGOV vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
SGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than GPIQ's 9.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.60% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.85% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGOV and GPIQ have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPIQ has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to SGOV (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOV dropped -0.03% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.
On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 33.04% vs 3.95% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 33.04% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIQ.
GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.60%, compared with 3.85% for SGOV.
SGOV is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SGOV and 0.29% for GPIQ.
SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGOV and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer