PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGOV vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGOV vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGOV achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 0.30% return.


SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*

GLDM

1D
0.25%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
0.30%
6M
3.19%
1Y
30.55%
3Y*
30.08%
5Y*
17.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGOV vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.56%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.05%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.30%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SGOV and GLDM is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2020

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGOV vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGOV vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGOVGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+19.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+274.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

195.55

1.23

+194.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

398.20

1.53

+396.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4,461.99

3.85

+4,458.14

SGOV vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGOV Sharpe Ratio is 20.28, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGOV and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGOVGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.28

1.15

+19.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

14.78

1.00

+13.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

12.50

0.99

+11.51

Drawdowns

SGOV vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGOV drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOV and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGOVGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-21.63%

+21.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-20.00%

+19.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

-20.00%

+19.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.03%

-20.92%

+20.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-19.80%

+19.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-6.24%

+6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

7.96%

-7.96%

Volatility

SGOV vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) is 0.06%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that SGOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGOVGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

5.65%

-5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

23.31%

-23.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

26.65%

-26.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.24%

17.98%

-17.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.24%

16.89%

-16.65%

SGOV vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGOV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGOV vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

SGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGOV and GLDM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to SGOV (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOV dropped -0.03% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.89% vs 3.55% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.89% return vs 3.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

SGOV is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while GLDM is Gold. SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SGOV and 0.10% for GLDM.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGOV and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer