SGOV vs. CMDY
SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) and CMDY (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index, while CMDY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGOV returned 3.55%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for CMDY. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. SGOV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CMDY.
Performance
SGOV vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGOV achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 21.76% return.
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- —
CMDY
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 21.76%
- 6M
- 21.83%
- 1Y
- 31.65%
- 3Y*
- 14.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- —
SGOV vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 1.56% | 4.24% | 5.27% | 5.12% | 1.58% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 21.76% | 15.81% | 5.43% | -9.33% | 14.55% | 26.38% | 22.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGOV and CMDY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020 | -0.08 |
The correlation between SGOV and CMDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.02 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGOV vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank
SGOV
CMDY
SGOV vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGOV | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +18.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +273.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 195.55 | 1.35 | +194.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 398.20 | 4.11 | +394.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4,461.99 | 11.95 | +4,450.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGOV | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.28 | 1.96 | +18.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 14.78 | 0.63 | +14.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 12.50 | 0.53 | +11.97 |
Drawdowns
SGOV vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOV drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOV and CMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGOV | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -31.19% | +31.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -7.73% | +7.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.01% | -10.08% | +10.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.03% | -26.56% | +26.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.78% | +6.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -13.13% | +13.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 2.66% | -2.66% |
Volatility
SGOV vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) is 0.06%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that SGOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGOV | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | 5.12% | -5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.13% | 14.45% | -14.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 16.28% | -16.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.24% | 15.83% | -15.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.24% | 14.65% | -14.41% |
SGOV vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGOV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGOV vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison
SGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than CMDY's 10.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 10.59% | 12.89% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.15% | 2.21% | 1.73% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.85% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGOV and CMDY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMDY has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to SGOV (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOV dropped -0.03% vs CMDY's -31.19%.
On 5-year performance, CMDY leads with 9.88% vs 3.55% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CMDY has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 3.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CMDY.
CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 10.59%, compared with 3.85% for SGOV.
SGOV is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CMDY is Commodities. SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index, while CMDY tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SGOV and 0.28% for CMDY.
SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGOV and CMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer