PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGOV vs. BDCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGOV vs. BDCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGOV achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than BDCX's -11.90% return.


SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*

BDCX

1D
-0.44%
1M
-5.50%
YTD
-11.90%
6M
-14.62%
1Y
-18.01%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGOV vs. BDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.56%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.05%
BDCX
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN
-11.90%-10.42%15.32%35.33%-17.67%52.70%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SGOV and BDCX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGOV vs. BDCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BDCX
BDCX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGOV vs. BDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGOVBDCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+20.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+276.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

195.55

0.91

+194.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

398.20

-0.59

+398.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4,461.99

-1.04

+4,463.03

SGOV vs. BDCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGOV Sharpe Ratio is 20.28, which is higher than the BDCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGOV and BDCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGOVBDCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.28

-0.66

+20.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

14.78

0.05

+14.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

12.50

0.43

+12.07

Drawdowns

SGOV vs. BDCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGOV drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum BDCX drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOV and BDCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGOVBDCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-34.96%

+34.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-30.46%

+30.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

-33.39%

+33.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.03%

-34.96%

+34.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-28.40%

+28.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-10.10%

+10.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

17.35%

-17.35%

Volatility

SGOV vs. BDCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) is 0.06%, while ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a volatility of 8.65%. This indicates that SGOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGOVBDCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

8.65%

-8.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

22.81%

-22.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

27.60%

-27.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.24%

26.59%

-26.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.24%

26.94%

-26.70%

SGOV vs. BDCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGOV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BDCX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGOV vs. BDCX - Dividend Comparison

SGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than BDCX's 20.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BDCX
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN
20.31%19.17%15.28%14.71%17.47%11.52%6.32%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGOV and BDCX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDCX has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to SGOV (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOV dropped -0.03% vs BDCX's -34.96%.

On 5-year performance, SGOV leads with 3.55% vs 1.22% for BDCX. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SGOV has performed better with a 3.55% return vs 1.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BDCX.

BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 20.31%, compared with 3.85% for SGOV.

SGOV is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BDCX is Leveraged Equities. SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index, while BDCX tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SGOV and 0.95% for BDCX.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGOV and BDCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer