SGIIX vs. CGBL
SGIIX (First Eagle Global Fund Class I) and CGBL (Capital Group Core Balanced ETF) are both funds - SGIIX is a Global Equities fund managed by First Eagle, while CGBL is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past year, SGIIX returned 23.81% vs 16.11% for CGBL. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGIIX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGBL.
Performance
SGIIX vs. CGBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGIIX achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly higher than CGBL's 5.41% return.
SGIIX
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 8.03%
- 1Y
- 23.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
CGBL
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 5.41%
- 6M
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- 16.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGIIX vs. CGBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SGIIX First Eagle Global Fund Class I | 5.96% | 31.94% | 12.03% | 6.83% |
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | 5.41% | 15.33% | 16.64% | 9.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGIIX and CGBL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023 | 0.77 |
The correlation between SGIIX and CGBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGIIX vs. CGBL — Risk / Return Rank
SGIIX
CGBL
SGIIX vs. CGBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Global Fund Class I (SGIIX) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGIIX | CGBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.30 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.05 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.10 | 9.04 | -0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGIIX | CGBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.64 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.62 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
SGIIX vs. CGBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGIIX drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than CGBL's maximum drawdown of -11.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGIIX and CGBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGIIX | CGBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -11.66% | -25.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -7.88% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.63% | -2.50% | -2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -1.29% | -2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 1.79% | +1.21% |
Volatility
SGIIX vs. CGBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Eagle Global Fund Class I (SGIIX) is 3.22%, while Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that SGIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGIIX | CGBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | 3.53% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 8.17% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.41% | 9.88% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.00% | 11.09% | +0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 11.09% | +1.42% |
SGIIX vs. CGBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGIIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than CGBL's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGIIX vs. CGBL - Dividend Comparison
SGIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.07%, more than CGBL's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | 1.89% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGIIX First Eagle Global Fund Class I | 9.07% | 9.61% | 5.68% | 3.74% | 4.41% | 6.49% | 2.61% | 5.72% | 6.66% | 4.50% | 4.96% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGIIX and CGBL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGBL has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to SGIIX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGIIX dropped -37.03% vs CGBL's -11.66%.
SGIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGIIX and CGBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer