SFM vs. CRWV
SFM (Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.) and CRWV (CoreWeave, Inc.) are both stocks. SFM operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while CRWV operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past year, SFM returned -48.76% vs -26.96% for CRWV. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SFM vs. CRWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFM achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly lower than CRWV's 42.95% return.
SFM
- 1D
- 4.60%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- -48.76%
- 3Y*
- 36.73%
- 5Y*
- 25.66%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
CRWV
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -10.32%
- YTD
- 42.95%
- 6M
- 18.70%
- 1Y
- -26.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFM vs. CRWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 8.80% | -46.28% |
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. | 42.95% | 83.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFM and CRWV is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | 0.02 |
Fundamentals
SFM:
$8.29B
CRWV:
$53.95B
SFM:
$5.20
CRWV:
-$3.27
SFM:
0.95
CRWV:
8.00
SFM:
5.78
CRWV:
11.34
SFM:
$8.90B
CRWV:
$6.23B
SFM:
$3.41B
CRWV:
$4.32B
SFM:
$837.54M
CRWV:
$1.89B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFM vs. CRWV — Risk / Return Rank
SFM
CRWV
SFM vs. CRWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFM | CRWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.02 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.42 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | -0.62 | -0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFM | CRWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.06 | -0.28 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 1.06 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
SFM vs. CRWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFM drawdown since its inception was -72.88%, which is greater than CRWV's maximum drawdown of -64.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFM and CRWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFM | CRWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.88% | -64.84% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.17% | -64.84% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.72% | -44.24% | -7.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.28% | -37.21% | -3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.98% | 43.73% | +1.25% |
Volatility
SFM vs. CRWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) is 13.71%, while CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) has a volatility of 25.28%. This indicates that SFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFM | CRWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 25.28% | -11.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.32% | 68.15% | -37.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.09% | 95.71% | -49.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.26% | 114.59% | -75.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.82% | 114.59% | -76.77% |
Dividends
SFM vs. CRWV - Dividend Comparison
Neither SFM nor CRWV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SFM vs. CRWV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. and CoreWeave, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SFM vs. CRWV - Profitability Comparison
SFM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a gross profit of 917.28M and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
CRWV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.5%.
SFM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported an operating income of 215.31M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
CRWV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported an operating income of -144.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.9%.
SFM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a net income of 163.72M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
CRWV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a net income of -740.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in a net margin of -35.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SFM and CRWV have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWV has higher volatility (25.28%) compared to SFM (13.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFM dropped -72.88% vs CRWV's -64.84%.
CRWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFM and CRWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer