PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEML.L vs. SXRS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEML.L vs. SXRS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (SXRS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SEML.L is traded in GBP, while SXRS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SXRS.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEML.L achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than SXRS.DE's 22.81% return.


SEML.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.36%
6M
0.73%
1Y
9.22%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
3.00%

SXRS.DE

1D
-1.48%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
22.81%
6M
23.51%
1Y
37.42%
3Y*
12.69%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEML.L vs. SXRS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.36%10.31%-1.19%5.42%-0.23%-9.48%-1.55%8.21%1.49%
SXRS.DE
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
22.81%10.17%6.12%-12.23%27.30%30.12%-8.48%4.01%-3.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SEML.L and SXRS.DE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2018

0.27

The correlation between SEML.L and SXRS.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEML.L vs. SXRS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEML.L
SEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SXRS.DE
SXRS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SXRS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEML.L vs. SXRS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (SXRS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEML.LSXRS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

5.01

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

11.51

-5.89

SEML.L vs. SXRS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEML.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the SXRS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEML.L and SXRS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEML.LSXRS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.05

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.72

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.53

-0.60

Drawdowns

SEML.L vs. SXRS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEML.L drawdown since its inception was -46.67%, which is greater than SXRS.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEML.L and SXRS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEML.LSXRS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.67%

-28.60%

-18.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.78%

-7.71%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.78%

-14.74%

+9.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.11%

-28.60%

+17.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.11%

-5.11%

-8.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.82%

-12.63%

-14.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

3.36%

-1.72%

Volatility

SEML.L vs. SXRS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) is 1.81%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (SXRS.DE) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that SEML.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXRS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEML.LSXRS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

5.64%

-3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.39%

16.67%

-12.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.65%

18.81%

-13.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.46%

16.86%

-9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.50%

15.79%

-6.29%

SEML.L vs. SXRS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEML.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRS.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEML.L vs. SXRS.DE - Dividend Comparison

SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, while SXRS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
6.89%5.44%5.56%5.05%5.25%4.58%5.13%5.44%7.30%6.75%6.78%5.18%
SXRS.DE
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEML.L and SXRS.DE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRS.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRS.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEML.L.

SEML.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SXRS.DE is Commodities. SEML.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while SXRS.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SEML.L and 0.19% for SXRS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEML.L and SXRS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer