SEM vs. NHC
SEM (Select Medical Holdings Corporation) and NHC (National HealthCare Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Medical Care Facilities industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 10 years, SEM returned 11.09%/yr vs 14.72%/yr for NHC. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SEM vs. NHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEM achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly lower than NHC's 37.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SEM has underperformed NHC with an annualized return of 11.09%, while NHC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.72% annualized return.
SEM
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 12.02%
- 1Y
- 9.24%
- 3Y*
- 4.38%
- 5Y*
- -3.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
NHC
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 37.48%
- 6M
- 43.22%
- 1Y
- 80.47%
- 3Y*
- 48.50%
- 5Y*
- 24.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
SEM vs. NHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEM Select Medical Holdings Corporation | 12.48% | -19.84% | 51.24% | -3.52% | -13.85% | 7.41% | 18.51% | 52.05% | -13.03% | 33.21% |
NHC National HealthCare Corporation | 37.48% | 30.34% | 19.05% | 60.84% | -9.42% | 5.39% | -20.66% | 13.02% | 32.43% | -17.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEM and NHC is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009 | 0.39 |
Fundamentals
SEM:
$1.44
NHC:
$7.89
SEM:
11.49
NHC:
23.79
SEM:
0.28
NHC:
1.95
SEM:
$5.52B
NHC:
$1.51B
SEM:
$588.00M
NHC:
$558.31M
SEM:
$442.21M
NHC:
$204.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEM vs. NHC — Risk / Return Rank
SEM
NHC
SEM vs. NHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) and National HealthCare Corporation (NHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEM | NHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.41 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 6.16 | -5.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.98 | 16.45 | -15.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEM | NHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 2.52 | -2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.87 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.52 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.25 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
SEM vs. NHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEM drawdown since its inception was -60.26%, smaller than the maximum NHC drawdown of -96.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEM and NHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEM | NHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.26% | -96.33% | +36.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.02% | -13.13% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.04% | -33.40% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.09% | -33.40% | -15.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.26% | -35.27% | -24.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.10% | -5.90% | -16.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.66% | -26.42% | +3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.40% | 4.92% | +4.48% |
Volatility
SEM vs. NHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) is 0.69%, while National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) has a volatility of 13.13%. This indicates that SEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEM | NHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.69% | 13.13% | -12.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 25.60% | -12.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.38% | 32.13% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.44% | 27.74% | +9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.30% | 28.21% | +14.09% |
Dividends
SEM vs. NHC - Dividend Comparison
SEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than NHC's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHC National HealthCare Corporation | 1.36% | 1.85% | 2.25% | 2.53% | 3.80% | 3.11% | 3.13% | 2.38% | 2.52% | 3.10% | 2.31% | 3.14% |
SEM Select Medical Holdings Corporation | 1.51% | 1.68% | 97.39% | 2.13% | 2.01% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.84% |
Financials
SEM vs. NHC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Select Medical Holdings Corporation and National HealthCare Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SEM vs. NHC - Profitability Comparison
SEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Medical Holdings Corporation reported a gross profit of 175.47M and revenue of 1.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.
NHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National HealthCare Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 369.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Medical Holdings Corporation reported an operating income of 98.42M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.
NHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National HealthCare Corporation reported an operating income of 32.25M and revenue of 369.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.
SEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Medical Holdings Corporation reported a net income of 44.00M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
NHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National HealthCare Corporation reported a net income of 35.86M and revenue of 369.81M, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SEM and NHC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NHC has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to SEM (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEM dropped -60.26% vs NHC's -96.33%.
NHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEM and NHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer