PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEM vs. DVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SEM vs. DVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) and DaVita Inc. (DVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEM achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly lower than DVA's 69.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SEM has outperformed DVA with an annualized return of 11.09%, while DVA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.70% annualized return.


SEM

1D
0.18%
1M
1.36%
YTD
12.48%
6M
12.02%
1Y
9.24%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
-3.65%
10Y*
11.09%

DVA

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
69.07%
6M
64.10%
1Y
39.29%
3Y*
25.37%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEM vs. DVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEM
Select Medical Holdings Corporation
12.48%-19.84%51.24%-3.52%-13.85%7.41%18.51%52.05%-13.03%33.21%
DVA
DaVita Inc.
69.07%-24.03%42.75%40.30%-34.36%-3.10%56.47%45.80%-28.78%12.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SEM and DVA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009

0.40

The correlation between SEM and DVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

SEM:

$1.44

DVA:

$13.07

PE Ratio

SEM:

11.49

DVA:

14.70

PS Ratio

SEM:

0.28

DVA:

0.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

SEM:

$5.52B

DVA:

$13.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SEM:

$588.00M

DVA:

$3.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

SEM:

$442.21M

DVA:

$2.49B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEM vs. DVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEM
SEM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DVA
DVA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEM vs. DVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) and DaVita Inc. (DVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEMDVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.24

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

1.26

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.98

2.81

-1.83

SEM vs. DVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the DVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEM and DVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEMDVADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

0.92

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.26

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.28

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.33

-0.11

Drawdowns

SEM vs. DVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEM drawdown since its inception was -60.26%, smaller than the maximum DVA drawdown of -92.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEM and DVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMDVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.26%

-92.91%

+32.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.02%

-31.36%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.04%

-41.43%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.09%

-51.10%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.26%

-51.10%

-9.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.10%

-4.22%

-17.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.66%

-20.07%

-2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.40%

14.02%

-4.62%

Volatility

SEM vs. DVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) is 0.69%, while DaVita Inc. (DVA) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that SEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEMDVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

8.03%

-7.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.47%

34.95%

-21.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.38%

42.88%

-11.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.44%

37.26%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.30%

34.73%

+7.57%

Dividends

SEM vs. DVA - Dividend Comparison

SEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while DVA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVA
DaVita Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEM
Select Medical Holdings Corporation
1.51%1.68%97.39%2.13%2.01%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.84%

Financials

SEM vs. DVA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Select Medical Holdings Corporation and DaVita Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
1.42B
3.42B
(SEM) Total Revenue
(DVA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SEM vs. DVA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Select Medical Holdings Corporation and DaVita Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
12.3%
0
Portfolio components
SEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Medical Holdings Corporation reported a gross profit of 175.47M and revenue of 1.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.

DVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DaVita Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Medical Holdings Corporation reported an operating income of 98.42M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.

DVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DaVita Inc. reported an operating income of 481.89M and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

SEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Medical Holdings Corporation reported a net income of 44.00M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

DVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DaVita Inc. reported a net income of 197.53M and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SEM and DVA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVA has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to SEM (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEM dropped -60.26% vs DVA's -92.91%.

DVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEM and DVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer