SEC0.DE vs. INRG.L
SEC0.DE (iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and INRG.L (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - SEC0.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped, while INRG.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEC0.DE returned 56.37%/yr vs 3.44%/yr for INRG.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEC0.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INRG.L.
Performance
SEC0.DE vs. INRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SEC0.DE is traded in EUR, while INRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INRG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEC0.DE achieves a 98.10% return, which is significantly higher than INRG.L's 32.12% return.
SEC0.DE
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 15.32%
- YTD
- 98.10%
- 6M
- 96.55%
- 1Y
- 187.70%
- 3Y*
- 56.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INRG.L
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 32.12%
- 6M
- 29.67%
- 1Y
- 65.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
SEC0.DE vs. INRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEC0.DE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 98.10% | 36.46% | 20.85% | 61.01% | -32.22% | 21.11% |
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 32.12% | 27.16% | -20.99% | -22.37% | -0.03% | -3.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEC0.DE and INRG.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2021 | 0.48 |
The correlation between SEC0.DE and INRG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEC0.DE vs. INRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SEC0.DE
INRG.L
SEC0.DE vs. INRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEC0.DE | INRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.42 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.81 | 5.27 | +9.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 52.61 | 16.11 | +36.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEC0.DE | INRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.89 | 2.62 | +3.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | -0.01 | +1.18 |
Drawdowns
SEC0.DE vs. INRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEC0.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.35%, smaller than the maximum INRG.L drawdown of -92.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEC0.DE and INRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEC0.DE | INRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.35% | -92.17% | +52.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | -12.31% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.35% | -43.57% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -63.33% | +60.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.85% | -76.77% | +64.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 4.03% | -0.39% |
Volatility
SEC0.DE vs. INRG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) at 10.62%. This indicates that SEC0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEC0.DE | INRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 10.62% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.14% | 18.48% | +6.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.42% | 24.82% | +7.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.95% | 25.09% | +4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.95% | 25.66% | +4.29% |
SEC0.DE vs. INRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEC0.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than INRG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEC0.DE vs. INRG.L - Dividend Comparison
SEC0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INRG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.87% | 1.34% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.51% | 0.74% | 0.48% | 1.60% | 2.81% | 2.83% | 2.73% | 2.55% |
SEC0.DE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEC0.DE and INRG.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEC0.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEC0.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INRG.L.
SEC0.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while INRG.L is Energy Equities. SEC0.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped, while INRG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SEC0.DE and 0.65% for INRG.L.
Find the right allocation for SEC0.DE and INRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer