SE vs. KEN
SE (Sea Limited) and KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. SE operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services), while KEN operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, SE returned -20.32%/yr vs 34.36%/yr for KEN. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SE vs. KEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SE achieves a -33.77% return, which is significantly lower than KEN's 20.71% return.
SE
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- YTD
- -33.77%
- 6M
- -34.14%
- 1Y
- -48.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- -20.32%
- 10Y*
- —
KEN
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -13.88%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 30.64%
- 1Y
- 116.81%
- 3Y*
- 61.79%
- 5Y*
- 34.36%
- 10Y*
- 42.04%
SE vs. KEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SE Sea Limited | -33.77% | 20.24% | 161.98% | -22.16% | -76.74% | 12.39% | 394.90% | 255.30% | -15.08% | -18.02% |
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 20.71% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -23.73% | 93.65% | 57.17% | 50.73% | 23.06% | 28.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SE and KEN is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017 | 0.19 |
The correlation between SE and KEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SE:
$53.75B
KEN:
$4.06B
SE:
$2.57
KEN:
$1.54
SE:
32.82
KEN:
49.63
SE:
0.15
KEN:
8.33
SE:
2.10
KEN:
4.01
SE:
4.18
KEN:
2.71
SE:
$25.19B
KEN:
$1.01B
SE:
$11.15B
KEN:
$166.82M
SE:
$2.33B
KEN:
$339.95M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SE vs. KEN — Risk / Return Rank
SE
KEN
SE vs. KEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sea Limited (SE) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SE | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.44 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 5.49 | -6.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 19.50 | -20.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SE | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 | 3.01 | -3.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.87 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.75 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
SE vs. KEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SE drawdown since its inception was -90.51%, which is greater than KEN's maximum drawdown of -69.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SE and KEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SE | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.51% | -69.20% | -21.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.22% | -21.39% | -38.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.22% | -32.27% | -27.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.51% | -69.20% | -21.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.98% | -19.88% | -57.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.06% | -23.18% | -20.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.90% | 6.02% | +29.88% |
Volatility
SE vs. KEN - Volatility Comparison
Sea Limited (SE) has a higher volatility of 19.06% compared to Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) at 14.44%. This indicates that SE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SE | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.06% | 14.44% | +4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.96% | 29.95% | +8.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.73% | 39.14% | +11.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.12% | 39.77% | +24.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.63% | 41.90% | +20.73% |
Dividends
SE vs. KEN - Dividend Comparison
SE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.03% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
SE Sea Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SE vs. KEN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sea Limited and Kenon Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SE vs. KEN - Profitability Comparison
SE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported a gross profit of 3.15B and revenue of 7.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.
KEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.
SE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported an operating income of 565.39M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.
KEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
SE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported a net income of 427.94M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
KEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SE and KEN have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SE has higher volatility (19.06%) compared to KEN (14.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SE dropped -90.51% vs KEN's -69.20%.
KEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SE and KEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer