PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDIV vs. IGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDIV vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDIV achieves a 5.37% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's -0.64% return.


SDIV

1D
-0.49%
1M
-5.69%
YTD
5.37%
6M
6.78%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
-1.15%
10Y*
-0.10%

IGLD

1D
0.22%
1M
-7.38%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
2.24%
1Y
23.15%
3Y*
21.74%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDIV vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
5.37%29.12%1.77%5.46%-26.43%-3.24%
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
-0.64%47.46%19.36%9.24%-2.34%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIV and IGLD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDIV vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDIV
SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLD
IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDIV vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDIVIGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

1.32

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.07

3.48

+7.59

SDIV vs. IGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the IGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIV and IGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDIVIGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

0.99

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.83

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.90

-0.84

Drawdowns

SDIV vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and IGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDIVIGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-18.59%

-38.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-17.56%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-17.56%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.94%

-18.59%

-23.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.24%

-17.10%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-5.27%

-13.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

6.67%

-4.57%

Volatility

SDIV vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) is 4.15%, while FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that SDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDIVIGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

5.18%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

21.28%

-11.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

23.50%

-10.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

15.24%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.98%

15.06%

+3.92%

SDIV vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDIV vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison

SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%, less than IGLD's 18.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
18.34%9.91%20.81%7.85%4.45%2.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
9.29%9.59%11.33%11.73%14.17%8.95%7.96%8.73%9.22%6.66%6.95%7.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDIV and IGLD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGLD has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to SDIV (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDIV dropped -56.90% vs IGLD's -18.59%.

On 5-year performance, IGLD leads with 12.52% vs -1.15% for SDIV. On fees, SDIV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IGLD has performed better with a 12.52% return vs -1.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDIV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 18.34%, compared with 9.29% for SDIV.

SDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while IGLD is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SDIV and 0.85% for IGLD.

SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDIV and IGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer