SCZ vs. BBTBX
SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) and BBTBX (Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund) are both funds - SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while BBTBX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Bridge Builder. Over the past 10 years, SCZ returned 8.12%/yr vs 1.77%/yr for BBTBX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for BBTBX.
Performance
SCZ vs. BBTBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly higher than BBTBX's -0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has outperformed BBTBX with an annualized return of 8.12%, while BBTBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.77% annualized return.
SCZ
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 10.42%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.34%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
BBTBX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.08%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
SCZ vs. BBTBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 7.96% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
BBTBX Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund | -0.41% | 7.82% | 1.89% | 5.41% | -13.49% | -1.12% | 8.54% | 9.15% | 0.13% | 4.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and BBTBX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2013 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, SCZ and BBTBX have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. BBTBX — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
BBTBX
SCZ vs. BBTBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund (BBTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCZ | BBTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.19 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.52 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.18 | 4.34 | +2.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCZ | BBTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.10 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.01 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.36 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.37 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. BBTBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than BBTBX's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and BBTBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | BBTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -18.54% | -43.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -2.97% | -8.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | -6.32% | -8.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | -18.54% | -18.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | -18.54% | -22.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -1.94% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.06% | -3.91% | -9.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 1.02% | +1.98% |
Volatility
SCZ vs. BBTBX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund (BBTBX) at 1.34%. This indicates that SCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBTBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | BBTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 1.34% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.26% | 2.96% | +9.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.71% | 4.10% | +10.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 5.97% | +10.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 4.94% | +12.51% |
SCZ vs. BBTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BBTBX's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCZ vs. BBTBX - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than BBTBX's 4.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBTBX Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund | 4.09% | 4.58% | 3.92% | 2.86% | 2.26% | 2.38% | 4.73% | 3.39% | 3.02% | 2.67% | 0.95% | 0.17% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.05% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCZ and BBTBX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCZ has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to BBTBX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs BBTBX's -18.54%.
SCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCZ and BBTBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer