SCHX vs. XHYD
SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and XHYD (BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while XHYD is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCHX returned 21.40%/yr vs 7.51%/yr for XHYD. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHYD.
Performance
SCHX vs. XHYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than XHYD's 0.44% return.
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 24.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- 15.20%
XHYD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX vs. XHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.56% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -12.11% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 0.44% | 8.33% | 6.29% | 11.75% | -5.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHX and XHYD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCHX and XHYD has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SCHX vs. XHYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHX
XHYD
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHX
XHYD
-
Communication Services
SCHX
XHYD
-
Financial Services
SCHX
XHYD
Consumer Cyclical
SCHX
XHYD
Industrials
SCHX
XHYD
Healthcare
SCHX
XHYD
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHX
XHYD
Energy
SCHX
XHYD
-
Utilities
SCHX
XHYD
Real Estate
SCHX
XHYD
-
Basic Materials
SCHX
XHYD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHX vs. XHYD — Risk / Return Rank
SCHX
XHYD
SCHX vs. XHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHX | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 2.36 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.15 | 10.53 | +1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHX | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.55 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.67 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
SCHX vs. XHYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, which is greater than XHYD's maximum drawdown of -11.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and XHYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHX | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -11.02% | -23.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -2.49% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -3.70% | -15.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -1.08% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -2.04% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 0.56% | +1.44% |
Volatility
SCHX vs. XHYD - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) at 1.83%. This indicates that SCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHX | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 1.83% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 3.28% | +6.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 3.79% | +8.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 7.15% | +10.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 7.15% | +11.02% |
SCHX vs. XHYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XHYD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHX vs. XHYD - Dividend Comparison
SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while XHYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 5.31% | 5.83% | 6.32% | 5.80% | 5.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHX and XHYD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to XHYD (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs XHYD's -11.02%.
On 3-year performance, SCHX leads with 21.40% vs 7.51% for XHYD. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XHYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 21.40% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYD.
XHYD has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 1.03% for SCHX.
SCHX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XHYD is High Yield Bonds. SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while XHYD tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.35% for XHYD.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHX and XHYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer