PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHP vs. VBK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHP vs. VBK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHP achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than VBK's 14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHP has underperformed VBK with an annualized return of 2.53%, while VBK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.47% annualized return.


SCHP

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*
2.53%

VBK

1D
0.58%
1M
0.15%
YTD
14.03%
6M
12.70%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
11.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHP vs. VBK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
0.96%6.76%1.95%3.91%-12.02%5.87%10.86%8.52%-1.78%3.02%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
14.03%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHP and VBK is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010

-0.04

The correlation between SCHP and VBK shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHP vs. VBK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHP
VBK

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%
9.6%

Financial Services

0.0%
5.6%

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.4%

Energy

-

4.8%

Healthcare

-

15.3%

Industrials

-

24.7%

Real Estate

-

3.9%

Technology

-

25.9%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHP
100.0%
VBK
9.6%

Financial Services

SCHP
0.0%
VBK
5.6%

Basic Materials

SCHP

-

VBK
3.2%

Communication Services

SCHP

-

VBK
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

SCHP

-

VBK
2.4%

Energy

SCHP

-

VBK
4.8%

Healthcare

SCHP

-

VBK
15.3%

Industrials

SCHP

-

VBK
24.7%

Real Estate

SCHP

-

VBK
3.9%

Technology

SCHP

-

VBK
25.9%

Utilities

SCHP

-

VBK
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHP vs. VBK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHP
SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHP vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHPVBKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.40

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.59

9.10

-1.51

SCHP vs. VBK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the VBK Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHP and VBK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHPVBKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.40

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.20

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.50

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.42

+0.08

Drawdowns

SCHP vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHP drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum VBK drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHP and VBK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHPVBKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.26%

-58.68%

+44.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

-11.44%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.48%

-27.54%

+23.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.26%

-38.39%

+24.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.26%

-38.70%

+24.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-3.91%

+3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-10.15%

+6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

3.02%

-2.39%

Volatility

SCHP vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) is 1.00%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that SCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHPVBKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

6.43%

-5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

15.18%

-12.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29%

19.65%

-16.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.12%

23.54%

-17.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.59%

22.90%

-17.31%

SCHP vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VBK's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHP vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison

SCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than VBK's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
4.01%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.46%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHP and VBK have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBK has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHP dropped -14.26% vs VBK's -58.68%.

On 10-year performance, VBK leads with 11.47% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBK has performed better with a 11.47% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VBK.

SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 0.46% for VBK.

SCHP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while VBK is Small Cap Growth Equities. SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHP and 0.05% for VBK.

SCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHP and VBK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer