SCHP vs. ICSH

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) and ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while ICSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. SCHP is passively managed, while ICSH is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHP returned 2.53%/yr vs 2.77%/yr for ICSH. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHP charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for ICSH.

Performance

SCHP vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHP achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than ICSH's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHP has underperformed ICSH with an annualized return of 2.53%, while ICSH has yielded a comparatively higher 2.77% annualized return.

SCHP

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 6M: 0.95%
• 1Y: 4.80%
• 3Y*: 3.84%
• 5Y*: 1.02%
• 10Y*: 2.53%

ICSH

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 4.30%
• 3Y*: 5.15%
• 5Y*: 3.67%
• 10Y*: 2.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHP vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF	0.96%	6.76%	1.95%	3.91%	-12.02%	5.87%	10.86%	8.52%	-1.78%	3.02%
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF	1.43%	4.96%	5.52%	5.58%	0.97%	0.16%	1.61%	3.17%	2.25%	1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHP and ICSH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013	0.17

Over the past year, SCHP and ICSH have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

SCHP vs. ICSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHP	ICSH
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	100.0%

Return for Risk

SCHP vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHP

SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 49
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 49

ICSH

ICSH Risk / Return Rank: 99
ICSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
ICSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
ICSH Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ICSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ICSH Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHP vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHP	ICSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	11.01	-9.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	27.36	-25.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	6.56	-5.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	43.67	-41.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.59	288.81	-281.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHP vs. ICSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the ICSH Sharpe Ratio of 11.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHP and ICSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHP	ICSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	11.01	-9.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	7.62	-7.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	2.63	-2.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	1.93	-1.43

Drawdowns

SCHP vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHP drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHP and ICSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHP	ICSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.26%	-3.94%	-10.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.93%	-0.10%	-1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.48%	-0.10%	-4.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.26%	-0.73%	-13.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.26%	-3.94%	-10.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.89%	-0.02%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.93%	-0.08%	-3.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	0.01%	+0.62%

Volatility

SCHP vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.15%. This indicates that SCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHP	ICSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.00%	0.15%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.24%	0.30%	+1.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.29%	0.39%	+2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.12%	0.48%	+5.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.59%	1.06%	+4.53%

SCHP vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHP vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison

SCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than ICSH's 4.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF	4.34%	4.55%	5.24%	4.78%	1.66%	0.42%	1.21%	2.61%	2.20%	1.36%	0.88%	0.54%
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF	4.01%	4.06%	2.99%	3.02%	7.19%	4.39%	1.11%	2.02%	2.26%	1.90%	1.38%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHP and ICSH in my portfolio?

SCHP and ICSH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHP or ICSH?

SCHP has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to ICSH (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHP dropped -14.26% vs ICSH's -3.94%.

Which ETF is better, SCHP or ICSH?

On 10-year performance, ICSH leads with 2.77% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHP or ICSH?

Over the 10-year period, ICSH has performed better with a 2.77% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHP or ICSH?

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for ICSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHP or ICSH?

ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 4.01% for SCHP.

What is the main difference between SCHP and ICSH?

SCHP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while ICSH is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHP and 0.08% for ICSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.01 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.