SCHP vs. BKLN

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) and BKLN (Invesco Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while BKLN is a Bank Loan fund tracking the Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHP returned 2.53%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for BKLN. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHP charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKLN.

Performance

SCHP vs. BKLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHP achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than BKLN's -0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHP has underperformed BKLN with an annualized return of 2.53%, while BKLN has yielded a comparatively higher 4.25% annualized return.

SCHP

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 6M: 0.95%
• 1Y: 4.80%
• 3Y*: 3.84%
• 5Y*: 1.02%
• 10Y*: 2.53%

BKLN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: -0.04%
• 6M: 0.55%
• 1Y: 4.39%
• 3Y*: 7.44%
• 5Y*: 5.09%
• 10Y*: 4.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHP vs. BKLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF	0.96%	6.76%	1.95%	3.91%	-12.02%	5.87%	10.86%	8.52%	-1.78%	3.02%
BKLN Invesco Senior Loan ETF	-0.04%	6.88%	8.21%	12.53%	-2.51%	2.32%	1.32%	10.03%	-1.32%	2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHP and BKLN is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2011	0.01

The correlation between SCHP and BKLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHP vs. BKLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHP	BKLN
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	2.3%
Financial Services	0.0%	2.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.7%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.8%
Industrials	-	0.8%
Real Estate	-	1.5%
Technology	-	5.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SCHP vs. BKLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHP

SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 49
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 49

BKLN

BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 50
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHP vs. BKLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHP	BKLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.61	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	2.37	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.37	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	1.44	+1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.59	5.65	+1.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHP vs. BKLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the BKLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHP and BKLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHP	BKLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	1.61	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	1.14	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.66	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.64	-0.14

Drawdowns

SCHP vs. BKLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHP drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum BKLN drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHP and BKLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHP	BKLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.26%	-24.17%	+9.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.93%	-3.07%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.48%	-3.55%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.26%	-7.31%	-6.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.26%	-24.17%	+9.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.89%	-0.48%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.93%	-1.09%	-2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	0.78%	-0.15%

Volatility

SCHP vs. BKLN - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) at 0.44%. This indicates that SCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHP	BKLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.00%	0.44%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.24%	2.52%	-0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.29%	2.75%	+0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.12%	4.48%	+1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.59%	6.43%	-0.84%

SCHP vs. BKLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BKLN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHP vs. BKLN - Dividend Comparison

SCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than BKLN's 6.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKLN Invesco Senior Loan ETF	6.63%	6.95%	8.41%	8.59%	4.93%	3.11%	3.56%	4.86%	4.52%	3.50%	4.54%	4.12%
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF	4.01%	4.06%	2.99%	3.02%	7.19%	4.39%	1.11%	2.02%	2.26%	1.90%	1.38%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHP and BKLN in my portfolio?

SCHP and BKLN have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHP or BKLN?

SCHP has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to BKLN (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHP dropped -14.26% vs BKLN's -24.17%.

Which ETF is better, SCHP or BKLN?

On 10-year performance, BKLN leads with 4.25% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BKLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHP or BKLN?

Over the 10-year period, BKLN has performed better with a 4.25% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHP or BKLN?

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHP or BKLN?

BKLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.63%, compared with 4.01% for SCHP.

What is the main difference between SCHP and BKLN?

SCHP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BKLN is Bank Loan. SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while BKLN tracks Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHP and 0.65% for BKLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.